SynthesisInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Prevention strategies of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Octopus-inspired suction-cup microneedle patch enables intralesional SMAD7/Budesonide co-delivery to disrupt TGF-β-driven fibrotic remodeling.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional-printed silk fibroin scaffolds loaded with adipose-derived stem cells prevent post endoscopic submucosal dissection esophageal stricture in a porcine model.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhat interventions effectively prevent postoperative stenosis following endoscopic resection (ER) of superficial esophageal cancer? This study aimed to identify effective interventions or combinations through a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
methodsSix databases were systematically searched for eligible studies up to 30 April 2023, on interventions to prevent esophageal stenosis post-ER. Odds ratios (ORs) evaluated stenosis rate (primary outcome) and complications (secondary outcome), while mean differences (MD) evaluated endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) sessions post-stenosis.
resultsTwenty-three studies involving 1271 patients and 11 different interventions were included. Eight interventions were effective in preventing post-ER stenosis: oral hydrocortisone sodium succinate and aluminum phosphate gel (OHA) (OR: 0.02, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.00-0.11), polyglycolic acid (PGA) + ST (OR: 0.02, 95% CrI: 0.00-0.23), oral tranilast (OT) + preemptive endoscopic balloon dilatation (PEBD) (OR: 0.08, 95% CrI: 0.01-0.77), botulinum toxin (BT) (OR: 0.10, 95% CrI: 0.03-0.32), ST (OR: 0.08, 95% CrI: 0.01-0.67), oral steroid (OS) (OR: 0.11, 95% CrI: 0.05-0.28), endoscopic triamcinolone injection (ETI) + OS (OR: 0.17, 95% CrI: 0.07-0.42), and ETI (OR: 0.18, 95% CrI: 0.11-0.30). Five interventions significantly reduced EBD sessions: PGA + ST (MD: -5.78, 95% CrI: -11.04 to -1.21), ETI + OS (MD: -3.27, 95% CrI: -5.37 to -0.72), OS (MD: -6.18, 95% CrI: -9.43 to -3.38), ETI (MD: -3.81, 95% CrI: -5.74 to -1.99), and BT (MD: -2.16, 95% CrI: -4.12 to -0.40). None of the interventions significantly increased complications.
conclusionsThis study confirmed the efficacy of OS, ETI, and ETI + OS and verified five other interventions (OHA, PGA + ST, OT + PEBD, BT, and ST) in preventing stenosis. Notably, PGA + ST and BT also reduced the number of EBD sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.