ReviewInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025
Virtual 3D models, augmented reality systems and virtual laparoscopic simulations in complicated pancreatic surgeries: state of art, future perspectives, and challenges.
Review in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-assisted Computer-Implant surgery : A comprehensive review of system architecture, clinical accuracy, and emerging technologies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with hepatic arterial variants: surgical outcomes and technical considerations in a single-center cohort.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and 3D Reconstruction in Complex Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- AI reshaping life sciences: intelligent transformation, application challenges, and future convergence in neuroscience, biology, and medicine.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is considered one of the most challenging interventions by many surgeons, mainly due to retroperitoneal location and proximity to key and delicate vascular structures. These factors make pancreatic resection a demanding procedure, with successful rates far from optimal and frequent postoperative complications. Surgical planning is essential to improve patient outcomes, and in this regard, many technological advances made in the last few years have proven to be extremely useful in medical fields. This review aims to outline the potential and limitations of 3D digital and 3D printed models in pancreatic surgical planning, as well as the impact and challenges of novel technologies such as augmented/virtual reality systems or artificial intelligence to improve medical training and surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.