Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869417›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025

Supporting equitable access to kidney transplant in remote Western Australia using continuous quality improvement.

Felicity Stewart, Nicholas Corsair, James Stacey, Sarah Cox, Joshua Bowring, Khalil Patankar, Iann Lee, Kristan Teasdale, Emma Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Felicity StewartKimberley Renal Services, PO Box 1377, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.
Nicholas CorsairKimberley Renal Services, PO Box 1377, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.
James StaceyKimberley Renal Services, PO Box 1377, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.
Sarah CoxKimberley Renal Services, PO Box 1377, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.
Joshua BowringKimberley Renal Services, PO Box 1377, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.
Khalil PatankarNephrology Department, Royal Perth Hospital, 197 Wellington Street Perth, WA 6000, Australia.
Iann LeeThe Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.
Kristan TeasdaleThe Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, 12 Napier Terrace Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.
Emma GriffithsKimberley Renal Services, PO Box 1377, Broome, Western Australia 6725, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-9451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite an epidemic of end-stage kidney disease in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, disparities in access to kidney transplantation persist. The journey to a successful kidney transplant is long, with an initial suitability assessment required before waitlist-specific activities begin. In an Aboriginal Community Controlled renal service, we aimed to: (i) design and implement a continuous quality improvement (CQI) approach to transplant suitability assessment, (ii) provide transplant suitability assessments for all patients of the service, (iii) describe what temporary contraindications to kidney transplantation should be the focus of health service improvements, (iv) explore participant experiences with the suitability assessment process, and (v) use our findings to inform pre- and post-transplant model of care development within Kimberley Renal Services.

methodsMixed methods design with file review. Transplant suitability assessment results with descriptive analysis and semi-structured interview with thematic analysis.

resultsOf completed assessments, 20/66 (30%) had no contraindications and were cleared for workup with median time on dialysis prior to assessment of 2.9 years, 42/66 (64%) had temporary contraindications, and 4/66 (6%) had permanent contraindications. Eighty-five temporary contraindications were identified in 46 individuals: 17/46 had both medical and nonmedical contraindications, 5/46 had medical contraindications only, and 24/46 had nonmedical contraindications only. The most common temporary contraindications were smoking (23/46), treatment adherence (17/46), and high body mass index (11/46). Patients wanted more information on the transplant process, and interviewers noted the importance of providing information in an appropriate way. Patients wanted more support to address modifiable health risk factors to improve their chances of future transplantation.

conclusionsIn the first stages of our CQI approach to improving access to kidney transplants for Kimberley Aboriginal people, we achieved substantial catch-up in suitability assessments and a comprehensive summary of factors impacting successful waitlisting. Our results are consistent with, and build upon other work in this space, highlighting the importance of involving Aboriginal staff and patients in education and support for prospective recipients.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityKidney TransplantationQuality ImprovementWaiting ListsAdultAgedAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedWestern AustraliaAboriginal healthCQIequitykidney transplantrenal

Identifiers

PMID39869417
PMCPMC11771395

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.