Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869425›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2025

Identifying the Views and Needs of Family Physicians on Providing Care to Living Kidney Donors: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Katya Loban, Emilie Trinh, Kathleen Gaudio, Diya Nijjar, Jorane-Tiana Robert, Ngan Lam, Scott McKay, Heather Badenoch, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Ann Bugeja and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katya LobanMEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Emilie TrinhMEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kathleen GaudioMEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Diya NijjarMEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jorane-Tiana RobertMEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ngan LamDivisions of Transplant Medicine and Nephrology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0129-7091
Scott McKayDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Heather BadenochCanadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, Ottawa, Alberta, Canada.
Marie-Chantal FortinCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ann BugejaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4106-0451
Rahul MainraDivision of Nephrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Christine DipchandDivision of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Shaifali SandalMEDIC, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-0598

Funding

Canadian Blood ServicesCanadian Institute of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing the long-term care and follow-up of living kidney donors (LKDs) has been challenging, and prior LKDs have reported suboptimal healthcare experiences. Long-term care of LKDs is largely undertaken by primary care practitioners such as family physicians (FPs). We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Canadian FPs (n = 151). In our sample, 21.9% of participants reported that ≥1 patient had expressed interest in becoming a LKD, and 39.9% provided care to prior LKDs. While 55.5% knew how to find information on living kidney donation, 75.5% reported that information was not available in their practice. Only a minority had formal training in living kidney donation (<5%), and self-reported knowledge was low (median = 3 [scale 1 = not strong to 10 = very strong]). Knowledge improved significantly with educational activities, resources, experience, and practice needs. Attitudes toward living kidney donation were generally favorable with 71.5% stating that FPs should be involved in post-donation care. Clinical care guidelines (78.8%) were the most desired resource, followed by clear communication and reliable contact at transplant centers. Our findings inform the transplant community of an avenue to optimize LKD care by better-supporting FPs, who provide care to LKDs. This may enhance data collection on LKD outcomes and potentially increase donation rates.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services Needs and DemandKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsNeeds AssessmentPhysicians, FamilyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurveys and Questionnairesdonor caredonor outcomeskidney transplantliving donationlong‐term care

Identifiers

PMID39869425
PMCPMC11771600

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.