Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39869809›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

No gender differences in attraction to young partners: A study of 4500 blind dates.

Paul W Eastwick, Eli J Finkel, Eva M Meza, Kellie Ammerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Partner preferences for resources adapt to income and gender economic inequality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul W EastwickDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0001-8512-8721
Eli J FinkelDepartment of Psychology, Kellogg School of Management, the Institute for Policy Research, and the Center for Enlightened Disagreement, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-0213-5318
Eva M MezaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Kellie AmmermanTawkify, Inc., Wilmington, DE 19804.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mixed-gender couples, men are older than women on average. Scholars and laypeople presume that this arrangement reflects mirrored preferences such that men desire younger partners and women desire older partners. Nevertheless, relevant published data on in-person romantic evaluations-that is, studies where adults interact in person and report their initial attraction to each other-are nearly nonexistent. We examined the association of a partner's age with romantic desire (

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsYoung Adultage differencesattractionclose relationshipsgendermate preferences

Identifiers

PMID39869809
PMCPMC11804577

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.