Evidence mapPaperPMID 39869906Full record

Observational studyJMIR aging2025

Exploring the Feasibility of a 5-Week mHealth Intervention to Enhance Physical Activity and an Active, Healthy Lifestyle in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.

Kim Daniels, Sharona Vonck, Jolien Robijns, Kirsten Quadflieg, Jochen Bergs, Annemie Spooren, Dominique Hansen, Bruno Bonnechère

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05650515 (The Development of a Technology-based Exercise Program for Older Adults Based on the Opinions of Older Adults and Geriatric Experts), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05650515 unknown statusnot on this map

The Development of a Technology-based Exercise Program for Older Adults Based on the Opinions of Older Adults and Geriatric Experts

TypeobservationalSponsorPXL University CollegeRan2022 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsOlder Adults, Exercise, Mobile ApplicationArmsCo-creation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kim DanielsCentre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL - Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-4518
Sharona VonckCentre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL - Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2522-4508
Jolien RobijnsCentre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL - Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6286-1581
Kirsten QuadfliegCentre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL - Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-3180
Jochen BergsCentre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL - Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7859-6949
Annemie SpoorenCentre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL - Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-1349
Dominique HansenREVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3074-2737
Bruno BonnechèreCentre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL - Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7729-4700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in mobile technology have paved the way for innovative interventions aimed at promoting physical activity (PA).

objectiveThe main objective of this feasibility study was to assess the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the More In Action (MIA) app, designed to promote PA among older adults. MIA offers 7 features: personalized tips, PA literacy, guided peer workouts, a community calendar, a personal activity diary, a progression monitor, and a chatbot.

methodsOur study used a mixed methods approach to evaluate the MIA app's acceptability, feasibility, and usability. First, a think-aloud method was used to provide immediate feedback during initial app use. Participants then integrated the app into their daily activities for 5 weeks. Behavioral patterns such as user session duration, feature use frequency, and navigation paths were analyzed, focusing on engagement metrics and user interactions. User satisfaction was assessed using the System Usability Scale, Net Promoter Score, and Customer Satisfaction Score. Qualitative data from focus groups conducted after the 5-week intervention helped gather insights into user experiences. Participants were recruited using a combination of web-based and offline strategies, including social media outreach, newspaper advertisements, and presentations at older adult organizations and local community services. Our target group consisted of native Dutch-speaking older adults aged >65 years who were not affected by severe illnesses. Initial assessments and focus groups were conducted in person, whereas the intervention itself was web based.

resultsThe study involved 30 participants with an average age of 70.3 (SD 4.8) years, of whom 57% (17/30) were female. The app received positive ratings, with a System Usability Scale score of 77.4 and a Customer Satisfaction Score of 86.6%. Analysis showed general satisfaction with the app's workout videos, which were used in 585 sessions with a median duration of 14 (IQR 0-34) minutes per day. The Net Promoter Score was 33.34, indicating a good level of customer loyalty. Qualitative feedback highlighted the need for improvements in navigation, content relevance, and social engagement features, with suggestions for better calendar visibility, workout customization, and enhanced social features. Overall, the app demonstrated high usability and satisfaction, with near-daily engagement from participants.

conclusionsThe MIA app shows significant potential for promoting PA among older adults, evidenced by its high usability and satisfaction scores. Participants engaged with the app nearly daily, particularly appreciating the workout videos and educational content. Future enhancements should focus on better calendar visibility, workout customization, and integrating social networking features to foster community and support. In addition, incorporating wearable device integration and predictive analytics could provide real-time health data, optimizing activity recommendations and health monitoring. These enhancements will ensure that the app remains user-friendly, relevant, and sustainable, promoting sustained PA and healthy behaviors among older adults.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05650515; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05650515.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionHealthy LifestyleIndependent LivingMobile ApplicationsTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalefeasibilityhealth promotionmHealthmobile healthmobile phoneolder adultsphysical activityusability

Identifiers

PMID39869906
PMCPMC11811674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.