Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39870723›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unsupervised data imputation with multiple importance sampling variational autoencoders.

Shenfen Kuang, Yewen Huang, Jie Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shenfen KuangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, 512005, China.
Yewen HuangSchool of Electronics and Information, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, 510665, China.
Jie SongSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, 512005, China. jiesong@sgu.edu.cn.

Funding

the Scientific Computing Research Innovation Team of Guangdong Province 2021KCXTD052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, deep latent variable models have made significant progress in dealing with missing data problems, benefiting from their ability to capture intricate and non-linear relationships within the data. In this work, we further investigate the potential of Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) in addressing the uncertainty associated with missing data via a multiple importance sampling strategy. We propose a Missing data Multiple Importance Sampling Variational Auto-Encoder (MMISVAE) method to effectively model incomplete data. Our approach consists of a learning step and an imputation step. During the learning step, the mixture components are represented by multiple separate encoder networks, which are later combined through simple averaging to enhance the latent representation capabilities of the VAEs when dealing with incomplete data. The statistical model and variational distributions are iteratively updated by maximizing the Multiple Importance Sampling Evidence Lower Bound (MISELBO) on the joint log-likelihood. In the imputation step, missing data is estimated using conditional expectation through multiple importance resampling. We propose an efficient imputation algorithm that broadens the scope of Missing data Importance Weighted Auto-Encoder (MIWAE) by incorporating multiple proposal probability distributions and the resampling schema. One notable characteristic of our method is the complete unsupervised nature of both the learning and imputation processes. Through comprehensive experimental analysis, we present evidence of the effectiveness of our method in improving the imputation accuracy of incomplete data when compared to current state-of-the-art VAEs-based methods.

Indexed as

Missing dataMultiple importance samplingResamplingVariational autoencoders

Identifiers

PMID39870723
PMCPMC11772574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.