ReviewAAPS PharmSciTech2025
Biosimilars: A Critical Review of Development, Regulatory Landscape, and Clinical Implications.
Review in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Overview and Trend Analysis of Biosimilar Approvals in China.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Host cell protein impurities in therapeutic proteins: overview of advances in detection, nonconventional removal technologies and immunogenicity assessment.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- A Three-Arm, Tiered Comparability Strategy Bridging Post-Approval Process Changes for an Omalizumab Biosimilar (CMAB007).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Navigating the Transition: A Scoping Review of System-Level Factors in Biosimilar Integration for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Article
- Bone-modifying therapy in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Beta-glucans in oncology: revolutionizing treatment with immune power & tumor targeting.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Creating A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool to Enhance Value-Based Purchasing of Generic and Biosimilar Medications in Saudi Arabia: A Pilot Study.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Formulation of Recombinant Therapeutic Proteins: Technological Innovation, Regulations, and Evolution Towards Buffer-Free Formulations.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Innovative Formulation Strategies for Biosimilars: Trends Focused on Buffer-Free Systems, Safety, Regulatory Alignment, and Intellectual Property Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biosimilars Targeting Pathogens: A Comprehensive Review of Their Role in Bacterial, Fungal, Parasitic, and Viral Infections.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Nonclinical evaluation of HS630, a proposed biosimilar of trastuzumab emtansine: affinity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biopharmaceutical industry has witnessed significant growth in the development and approval of biosimilars. These biosimilars aim to provide cost-effective alternatives to expensive originator biosimilars, alleviating financial pressures within healthcare. The manufacturing of biosimilars is a highly complex process that involves several stages, each of which must meet strict regulatory standards to ensure that the final product is highly similar to the reference biologic. To gain regulatory approval, biosimilars must undergo rigorous analytical characterization including in vitro assays, bioanalytical evaluations, and clinical similarity studies like pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments-to demonstrate safety, efficacy, quality comparability with reference products. Leading regulatory agencies such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) have established stringent guidelines for biosimilar evaluation and post-marketing surveillance. Despite this regulatory clarity, challenges around interchangeability, market exclusivity, and patent protection often delay market access and limit adoption, particularly in regions where automatic substitution is restricted. Case studies of biosimilars such as rituximab, adalimumab, filgrastim, and trastuzab reveal both advancements and ongoing hurdles in achieving broader market integration. The introduction of biosimilars has shown potential to reduce healthcare costs; for example, a recent analysis indicates a 20-30% cost reduction in the U.S. due to biosimilar adoption. As the biosimilar market expands, collaborative efforts among regulatory bodies, industry stakeholders, and healthcare providers are essential to enhance access to biologic therapies. This collaboration is poised to improve patient outcomes and catalyse transformative change in global healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39870890What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.