Evidence mapPaperPMID 39870982Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2025

Respiratory and Cardiovascular Medical Emergency Calls Related to Indoor Heat Exposure through a Case-Control Study in New York City.

Elaina Gonsoroski, James D Tamerius, Glenn Asaeda, Doug A Isaacs, James Braun, Richard Remigio, Rachael Cofield, John T Bandzuh, Christopher K Uejio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elaina GonsoroskiDepartment of Geography, Florida State University, Bellamy Building, Room 323, 113 Collegiate Loop, PO Box 3062190, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-2190, USA. edg17@fsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8368-7121
James D TameriusCenter of Sustainable Energy, 3980 Sherman St #170, San Diego, CA, 92110, USA.
Glenn AsaedaOffice of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of New York, 9 Metro Tech Center, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, USA.
Doug A IsaacsOffice of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of New York, 9 Metro Tech Center, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, USA.
James BraunOffice of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of New York, 9 Metro Tech Center, Brooklyn, NY, 11201, USA.
Richard RemigioDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Rachael CofieldDepartment of Geography, Florida State University, Bellamy Building, Room 323, 113 Collegiate Loop, PO Box 3062190, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-2190, USA.
John T BandzuhDepartment of Justice, Law, and Society, Mount Aloysius College, Cresson, PA, USA.
Christopher K UejioDepartment of Geography, Florida State University, Bellamy Building, Room 323, 113 Collegiate Loop, PO Box 3062190, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-2190, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding when and where heat adversely influences health outcomes is critical for targeting interventions and adaptations. However, few studies have analyzed the role of indoor heat exposures on acute health outcomes. To address this research gap, the study partnered with the New York City Fire Department Emergency Medical Services. Paramedics carried portable sensors that passively measured indoor temperatures at 3-min intervals while responding to calls during summer, 2016. Patient care reports provided the patient's chief health complaint and sociodemographic and health status information. Propensity score matching increased comparability between groups exposed to elevated indoor temperature versus those unexposed. To assess indoor heat-health associations, we conducted independent case-control studies between indoor heat exposures and cardiovascular (n = 735) and respiratory (n = 296) emergency medical calls when compared to heat-insensitive controls (n = 1611). Patients experiencing heat exposures (indoor temperature ≥ 28 °C) were not significantly more likely (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.64-2.09) to receive care for respiratory conditions. Both outdoor and indoor temperatures increased the odds of receiving care for cardiovascular versus comparison calls. Outdoor temperatures consistently elevated cardiovascular risks (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.19). There was some evidence that indoor temperatures further increased the odds of cardiovascular distress (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.97-2.13). Sensitivity testing suggested indoor temperatures at a lower threshold (≥ 26 °C) were unrelated to either health outcome. Along with converging lines of evidence linking extreme heat to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, we present one of the first indoor heat observational studies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesEmergency Medical ServicesHot TemperatureRespiratory Tract DiseasesAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityCardiovascularEmergency medical servicesExtreme heatIndoorRespiratory

Identifiers

PMID39870982
PMCPMC11865379

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.