Evidence mapPaperPMID 39871233Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2025

An empowerment programme to improve diet quality during pregnancy - the Power 4 a Healthy Pregnancy cluster randomised controlled trial.

Renske M van Lonkhuijzen, Jeanne H M de Vries, Elske Brouwer-Brolsma, Susanne Cremers, Janine P M Faessen, Edith J M Feskens, Annemarie Wagemakers

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pregnant Women's Experiences With a Collaborative Midwife-Dietitian Empowerment Programme to Improve Diet Quality.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Renske M van LonkhuijzenHealth and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706KN, The Netherlands. renske.vanlonkhuijzen@wur.nl.
Jeanne H M de VriesDivision of Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708WE, The Netherlands.
Elske Brouwer-BrolsmaDivision of Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708WE, The Netherlands.
Susanne Cremers, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Janine P M FaessenDivision of Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708WE, The Netherlands.
Edith J M FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition & Health, Wageningen University & Research, Stippeneng 4, Wageningen, 6708WE, The Netherlands.
Annemarie WagemakersHealth and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706KN, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA healthy diet during pregnancy is vital for the well-being of both mothers and babies. However, navigating dietary choices amidst the unique psychological and physiological changes of pregnancy can be challenging. Empowerment, defined as the ability to improve capacities, critically analyse situations, and take actions to improve them, can support pregnant women to make healthier choices. This intervention study assessed the effects of the 'Power 4 a Healthy Pregnancy' (P4HP) programme on diet quality and empowerment.

methodsIn a nonblinded, two-arm, parallel cluster randomised controlled trial, the P4HP programme was implemented in 16 randomly allocated Dutch midwifery practices, recruiting 342 participants. Participants were assigned to either the intervention (n = 186) or the control group (n = 156). The P4HP programme offered four additional consultations during pregnancy to discuss nutrition with both a midwife and dietitian, using an empowerment approach. The effectiveness of the P4HP programme was evaluated using pre- and post-intervention questionnaires assessing diet quality, empowerment, quality of life, sense of coherence, and self-rated health. The data were analysed using linear mixed models with an intention-to-treat approach.

resultsThe P4HP programme was conducted from approximately week 11 to week 34 of pregnancy. The total diet quality score significantly improved during pregnancy in the intervention group compared to the control group (4.28; 95% CI: 7.87 to 0.70; p = 0.019), particularly driven by improvements in the scores for vitamin D, iodine, and fish. Although other components, including fruit, whole-grain foods, nuts, dairy foods, iodine, and fish showed greater average increases in diet quality scores within the intervention group, these differences were not significant. Women across all empowerment levels expressed uncertainty regarding their weight gain during pregnancy.

conclusionThe P4HP programme positively influenced the dietary habits of pregnant women through empowerment. The observed improvement in diet quality underscores the potential of the P4HP programme as an effective intervention during pregnancy. This study lays the foundation for future empowerment-based interventions in maternal health contexts.

trial registrationInternational Clinical Trial Registry Platform NL-OMON23191, date of registration: 19/05/2021.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyEmpowermentHealth PromotionPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAdultFemaleHumansNetherlandsPregnancyProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCluster randomised controlled trialDiet qualityEmpowermentPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39871233
PMCPMC11771105

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.