ArticleBMC surgery2025
Understanding the dynamics of post-surgical recovery and its predictors in resource-limited settings: a prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Hybrid Ensemble Learning Framework for Predicting Lumbar Disc Herniation Recurrence: Integrating Supervised Models, Anomaly Detection, and Threshold Optimization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPost-surgical recovery time is influenced by various factors, including patient demographics, surgical details, pre-existing conditions, post-operative care, and socioeconomic status. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This study aims to identify significant predictors of post-surgical recovery time in a resource-limited Ethiopian hospital setting and to evaluate the variability attributable to individual patient differences and surgical team variations.
methodsA linear mixed model was employed to analyze data from 490 patients who underwent various surgical procedures. The analysis considered multiple predictors, including age, gender, BMI, type and duration of surgery, comorbidities (diabetes and hypertension), ASA scores, postoperative complications, pain management strategies, physiotherapy, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and socioeconomic status. Random effects were included to account for variability at the patient and surgical team levels.
resultsSignificant predictors of prolonged recovery time included higher BMI, longer surgery duration, the presence of diabetes and hypertension, higher ASA scores, and major post-operative complications. Opioid pain management was associated with increased recovery time, while inpatient physiotherapy reduced recovery duration. Socioeconomic status also significantly influenced recovery time. The model fit statistics indicated a robust model, with the unstructured covariance structure providing the best fit.
conclusionThe findings highlight the importance of individualized patient care and the effective management of modifiable factors such as BMI, surgery duration, and postoperative complications. Socioeconomic status emerged as a novel factor warranting further investigation. This study underscores the value of considering patient and surgical team variability in post-surgical recovery analysis, and calls for future research to explore additional predictors and alternative modeling techniques to enhance our understanding of the recovery process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.