Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39871553›Full record

ReviewCurrent gene therapy2025

Synergizing CRISPR-Cas9 with Advanced Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Precision Drug Delivery: Technological Nexus and Regulatory Insights.

Amrita Arup Roy, Rahul Pokale, Anoushka Mukharya, Ajinkya Nitin Nikam, Kamal Dua, Bola Sadashiva Satish Rao, Raviraja Neelavar Seetharam, Srinivas Mutalik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amrita Arup RoyDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Rahul PokaleDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Anoushka MukharyaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Ajinkya Nitin NikamDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Kamal DuaDiscipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia and Faculty of Health, Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.
Bola Sadashiva Satish RaoDepartment of Radiation Biology & Toxicology, Manipal School of Life Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Raviraja Neelavar SeetharamManipal Centre for Biotherapeutics Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Srinivas MutalikDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.

Funding

Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), Government of India, New Delhi 5/13/90/2020/NCD-III
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of genetic exploration tools, from laborious methods like radiationinduced mutations to the transformative CRISPR-Cas9 system, has fundamentally reshaped genetic research and gene editing capabilities. This journey, initiated by foundational techniques such as ZFNs and TALENs and culminating in the groundbreaking work of Doudna and Charpentier in 2012, has ushered in an era of precise DNA alteration and profound insights into gene functions. The CRISPR/Cas9 system uses the Cas9 enzyme and guides RNA (gRNA) to precisely target and cleave DNA, with subsequent repair via error-prone NHEJ or precise HDR, enabling versatile gene editing. Complementary computational tools like E-CRISP and Azimuth 2.0, alongside advanced deep learning models like DeepCRISPR, have significantly contributed to refining CRISPR experiments, optimizing gRNA efficiency, and predicting outcomes with greater precision. In clinical applications, CRISPR-Cas9 shows great promise for treating complex genetic disorders like sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia, but faces challenges such as off-target effects, immune responses to viral vectors, and ethical issues in germline editing. Overcoming these challenges requires meticulous experimentation and robust regulatory frameworks to ensure responsible and beneficial utilization of the CRISPR-Cas9 technology across diverse fields, including cancer treatment, genetic disease therapies, agriculture, and synthetic biology, while continually addressing ethical, safety, and legal considerations for its advancement and widespread adoption.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCRISPR-Cas SystemsDrug Delivery SystemsGene EditingMachine LearningGenetic TherapyHumansPrecision MedicineRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsAzimuth 2.0Cas9 proteincomputational toolsCRISPR-Cas9 systemDeepCRISPR.E-CRISPgene editinggRNAprotospacer adjacent motif (PAM)

Identifiers

PMID39871553

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.