ArticleDigital health
Can the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases be predicted more accurately by including lifestyle data? An exploratory study for data-driven prediction of COVID-19 cases in metropolitan cities using deep learning models.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The COVID-19 outbreak has significantly impacted human lifestyles and life patterns. Therefore, data related to human social life may tell us the increase or decrease in the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases. However, although the number of confirmed cases is affected by social life, it is difficult to find studies that attempt to predict the number of confirmed cases using various lifestyle data. This paper attempted an exploratory data analysis to see if the number of confirmed cases could be predicted more accurately by including various lifestyle data. Methods: We included taking public transportation, watching a movie at the cinema, and accommodation at a motel in the lifestyle data. Finally, a 'lifestyle addition' set was constructed that added lifestyle data to the number of past confirmed cases and search term frequency data. The deep learning algorithms used in the analysis are deep neural networks (DNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Performance differences across data sets and between deep learning models were tested to be statistically significant. Results: Among metropolitan cities in South Korea, Seoul (9.6 million) with the largest population and Busan (3.4 million) with the second largest population had the lowest error rate in 'lifestyle addition' set. When predicting with the 'lifestyle addition' set, in Seoul, the error rate was reduced to 20.1%, and in Busan, the graph of the actual number of confirmed cases and the predicted graph were almost identical. Conclusions: Through this study, we were able to identify three notable results that could contribute to predicting the number of patients infected with epidemic in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.