ArticleCureus2024
Allostatic Load and Oxidative Stress Markers in Women With Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oxidative Stress in Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia: Mechanistic and Clinical Insights.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllostatic load and oxidative stress (OS) markers differ in women with and without preeclampsia. However, there is no difference in allostatic load and OS markers between late-onset preeclampsia (L-OP) and early-onset preeclampsia (E-OP). This study aimed to compare the concentrations of allostatic load and OS markers in pregnant women with L-OP and E-OP.
methodsThis was a comparative cross-sectional study. Women with single pregnancy and a diagnosis of preeclampsia were included. Women with multiple pregnancies and/or chronic hypertension were excluded. Group 1 included women with E-OP (n=16), Group 2 included women with L-OP (n=45), and Group 3 included women without preeclampsia (n=40).
resultsNo statistical differences were found in maternal age, body mass index, or number of gestations. Arginase levels were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p = 0.04) and Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.01). Total antioxidative capacity was higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p = 0.03) and Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.001). Malondialdehyde levels were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p = 0.001) and Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.001). Total sulfhydryl compounds were lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p = 0.01) and Group 1 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.001). No differences were observed between study groups in allostatic load markers.
conclusionsHigher levels of OS markers were found in women with E-OP compared to women with L-OP and controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.