Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39872877›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Contrastive learning with transformer for adverse endpoint prediction in patients on DAPT post-coronary stent implantation.

Fang Li, Zenan Sun, Ahmed Abdelhameed, Tiehang Duan, Laila Rasmy, Xinyue Hu, Jianping He, Yifang Dang, Jingna Feng, Jianfu Li and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Fang Li *Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Zenan Sun *McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Ahmed AbdelhameedDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Tiehang DuanDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Laila RasmyMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Xinyue HuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Jianping HeMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Yifang DangMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Jingna FengDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Jianfu LiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Yichen WangDivision of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Tianchen LyuHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Naomi BraunHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Si PhamDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Michael GharacholouDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
DeLisa FairweatherDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Degui ZhiMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Jiang BianHealth Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Cui TaoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.

Funding

Role of mitochondrial extracellular vesicles in CVB3 myocarditis by sexR01HL164520 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI FAIRWEATHER, DELISA · 2022 to 2025
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL164520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is crucial for preventing adverse events. Traditional prognostic tools, such as rule-based methods or Cox regression, despite their widespread use and ease, tend to yield moderate predictive accuracy within predetermined timeframes. This study introduces a new contrastive learning-based approach to enhance prediction efficacy over multiple time intervals. Methods: We utilized retrospective, real-world data from the OneFlorida + Clinical Research Consortium. Our study focused on two primary endpoints: ischemic and bleeding events, with prediction windows of 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months post-DES implantation. Our approach first utilized an auto-encoder to compress patient features into a more manageable, condensed representation. Following this, we integrated a Transformer architecture with multi-head attention mechanisms to focus on and amplify the most salient features, optimizing the representation for better predictive accuracy. Then, we applied contrastive learning to enable the model to further refine its predictive capabilities by maximizing intra-class similarities and distinguishing inter-class differences. Meanwhile, the model was holistically optimized using multiple loss functions, to ensure the predicted results closely align with the ground-truth values from various perspectives. We benchmarked model performance against three cutting-edge deep learning-based survival models, i.e., DeepSurv, DeepHit, and SurvTrace. Results: The final cohort comprised 19,713 adult patients who underwent DES implantation with more than 1 month of records after coronary stenting. Our approach demonstrated superior predictive performance for both ischemic and bleeding events across prediction windows of 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, with time-dependent concordance (C Conclusion: The robust performance of our contrastive learning-based model underscores its potential to enhance DAPT management significantly. By delivering precise predictive insights at multiple time points, our method meets the current need for adaptive, personalized therapeutic strategies in cardiology, thereby offering substantial value in improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

adverse endpointcontrastive learningdrug-eluting coronary artery stent implantationdual antiplatelet therapypredictive modelingsurvival analysistransformer

Identifiers

PMID39872877
PMCPMC11769931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.