ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Contrastive learning with transformer for adverse endpoint prediction in patients on DAPT post-coronary stent implantation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting the Gut-Heart Axis in Atherosclerosis: Microbial Metabolites, Molecular Mechanisms, and Precision Therapeutics.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Effective management of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is crucial for preventing adverse events. Traditional prognostic tools, such as rule-based methods or Cox regression, despite their widespread use and ease, tend to yield moderate predictive accuracy within predetermined timeframes. This study introduces a new contrastive learning-based approach to enhance prediction efficacy over multiple time intervals. Methods: We utilized retrospective, real-world data from the OneFlorida + Clinical Research Consortium. Our study focused on two primary endpoints: ischemic and bleeding events, with prediction windows of 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months post-DES implantation. Our approach first utilized an auto-encoder to compress patient features into a more manageable, condensed representation. Following this, we integrated a Transformer architecture with multi-head attention mechanisms to focus on and amplify the most salient features, optimizing the representation for better predictive accuracy. Then, we applied contrastive learning to enable the model to further refine its predictive capabilities by maximizing intra-class similarities and distinguishing inter-class differences. Meanwhile, the model was holistically optimized using multiple loss functions, to ensure the predicted results closely align with the ground-truth values from various perspectives. We benchmarked model performance against three cutting-edge deep learning-based survival models, i.e., DeepSurv, DeepHit, and SurvTrace. Results: The final cohort comprised 19,713 adult patients who underwent DES implantation with more than 1 month of records after coronary stenting. Our approach demonstrated superior predictive performance for both ischemic and bleeding events across prediction windows of 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months, with time-dependent concordance (C Conclusion: The robust performance of our contrastive learning-based model underscores its potential to enhance DAPT management significantly. By delivering precise predictive insights at multiple time points, our method meets the current need for adaptive, personalized therapeutic strategies in cardiology, thereby offering substantial value in improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.