ArticleBrain communications2024
Assessing the cortical microstructure in contralesional sensorimotor areas after stroke.
Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cortical thickness analyses have provided valuable insights into changes in cortical brain structure after stroke and their association with recovery. Across studies though, relationships between cortical structure and function show inconsistent results. Recent developments in diffusion-weighted imaging of the cortex have paved the way to uncover hidden aspects of stroke-related alterations in cortical microstructure, going beyond cortical thickness as a surrogate for cortical macrostructure. Animal data obtained in rats and monkeys have evidenced that contralesional motor areas undergo degenerative alterations in their microstructure which are accompanied by compensatory changes as well. We hypothesized that cortical diffusion imaging can detect similar changes in human stroke survivors. We re-analysed clinical and imaging data of 42 well-recovered chronic stroke patients from two independent cohorts (mean age 64 years, 4 left-handed, 71% male, 16 right-sided strokes) and 33 healthy controls of similar age and gender. Cortical fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity and cortical thickness values were obtained for six key sensorimotor areas of the contralesional hemisphere. The regions included the primary motor cortex, dorsal and ventral premotor cortex, supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas and primary somatosensory cortex. Linear models were estimated for group comparisons between patients and controls and for correlations between cortical fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity and cortical thickness and clinical scores. Against our hypothesis, we did not find any significant alterations in contralesional cortical microstructure after stroke. Likewise, we did not detect any correlations between cortical microstructure and behavioural scores. Future analyses are warranted to investigate whether such alterations might occur in different populations, e.g. in later stages of recovery, in more severely impaired patients, or only in the ipsilesional hemisphere in patients with specific lesion patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.