ArticleJournal of renal care2025
Co-Producing Peritoneal Dialysis Nursing Sensitive Indicators for Quality Care: A Multinational Consensus Building Design.
Article in Journal of renal care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The construction and implementation of a clinical nursing experts-oriented retraining program for peritoneal dialysis specialist nurses.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNursing sensitive indicators are a way of measuring aspects of patient care that are most affected by the actions of the nurse. Despite the existence of nursing sensitive indicators, these are largely not suitable to measure peritoneal dialysis nursing practice.
objectiveThis project aimed to co-develop a set of peritoneal dialysis nursing-sensitive indicators.
designInformed by the Donabedian quality framework (structure, process, outcome), a multinational co-production consensus design was used. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: First, an expert panel of seven professionals proposed potential indicators from clinical expertise and examining peer-reviewed articles and clinical guidelines. Next, the expert panel undertook a consensus building process involving face-to-face meetings and online discussion to refine the indicators. Lastly indicator confirmation was undertaken using a 5-point rating scale involving delegates at a major conference.
resultsThe initial indicator proposal, based on evidence and clinical experience, identified 65 potential indicators (20 structural, 22 process and 23 outcome). The consensus process involved discussion and negotiation to reduce the potential indicators to 28 (eight structural, 12 process and eight outcome). Confirmation involved 25 nurses with all 28 indicators supported (all > 3.5/5). Indicators highly supported were patient satisfaction, fluid balance assessment, peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site, clinical signs measurement, peritonitis investigation, peritoneal dialysis catheter complications referral and infection rates.
conclusionFollowing further validity, reliability and feasibility testing, these nursing sensitive indicators can be used to measure the quality of peritoneal dialysis nursing care provided for patients and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.