ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Improving molecular subtypes and prognosis of pancreatic cancer through multi group analysis and machine learning.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Application Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer: From Diagnosis to Immunotherapy.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic cancer (PAC) has a complex tumor immune microenvironment, and currently, there is a lack of accurate personalized treatment. Establishing a novel consensus machine learning driven signature (CMLS) that offers a unique predictive model and possible treatment targets for this condition was the goal of this study.
methodsThis study integrated multiple omics data of PAC patients, applied ten clustering techniques and ten machine learning approaches to construct molecular subtypes for PAC, and created a new CMLS.
resultsUsing multi-omics clustering, we discovered two cancer subtypes (CSs) associated with prognosis, among which CS1 exhibited poor prognostic outcomes. Subsequently, 13 central genes were identified through screening, constituting CMLS with a significant prognostic ability. The low CMLS group had a better prognosis and was more likely to possess a "hot" tumor phenotype. The prognosis for the high CMLS group was dismal. Still, the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) levels in this group of patients were higher than in the low CMLS group, which were more favorable for immune therapy response.
conclusionThis study emphasizes that CMLS provides a beneficial instrument for early prediction of patient prognosis and screening of probable patients appropriate for immunotherapy and has broad implications for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.