ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning models for predicting interaction affinity energy between human serum proteins and hemodialysis membrane materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating dual convolutional networks and BiLSTM for precision prediction of chronic myeloid leukemia from protein sequences.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Review
- Engineering genetic circuits for dynamic control of central metabolism.Metabolic engineering · 2025Article
- Biocompatibility in hemodialysis: artificial membrane and human blood interactions.BMC nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane incompatibility poses significant health risks, including severe complications and potential fatality. Surface modification of membranes has emerged as a pivotal technology in the membrane industry, aiming to improve the hemocompatibility and performance of dialysis membranes by mitigating undesired membrane-protein interactions, which can lead to fouling and subsequent protein adsorption. Affinity energy, defined as the strength of interaction between membranes and human serum proteins, plays a crucial role in assessing membrane-protein interactions. These interactions may trigger adverse reactions, potentially harmful to patients. Researchers often rely on trial-and-error approaches to enhance membrane hemocompatibility by reducing these interactions. This study focuses on developing machine learning algorithms that accurately and rapidly predict affinity energy between novel chemical structures of membrane materials and human serum proteins, based on a molecular docking dataset. Various membrane materials with distinct characteristics, chemistry, and orientation are considered in conjunction with different proteins. A comparative analysis of linear regression, K-nearest neighbors regression, decision tree regression, random forest regression, XGBoost regression, lasso regression, and support vector regression is conducted to predict affinity energy. The dataset, comprising 916 records for both training and test segments, incorporates 12 parameters extracted from data points and involves six different proteins. Results indicate that random forest (R² = 0.8987, MSE = 0.36, MAE = 0.45) and XGBoost (R² = 0.83, MSE = 0.49, MAE = 0.49) exhibit comparable predictive performance on the training dataset. However, random forest outperforms XGBoost on the testing dataset. Seven machine learning algorithms for predicting affinity energy are analyzed and compared, with random forest demonstrating superior predictive accuracy. The application of machine learning in predicting affinity energy holds significant promise for researchers and professionals in hemodialysis. These models, by enabling early interventions in hemodialysis membranes, could enhance patient safety and optimize the care of hemodialysis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.