ArticleRespiratory research2025
Anti-IL-5 treatment, but not neutrophil interference, attenuates inflammation in a mixed granulocytic asthma mouse model, elicited by air pollution.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDiesel exhaust particles (DEP) have been proven to aggravate asthma pathogenesis. We previously demonstrated that concurrent exposure to house dust mite (HDM) and DEP in mice increases both eosinophils and neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and also results in higher levels of neutrophil-recruiting chemokines and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation compared to sole HDM, sole DEP or saline exposure. We aimed to evaluate whether treatment with anti-IL-5 can alleviate the asthmatic features in this mixed granulocytic asthma model. Moreover, we aimed to unravel whether neutrophils modulate the DEP-aggravated eosinophilic airway inflammation. MATERIAL AND
methodsFemale C57BL6/J mice were intranasally exposed to saline or HDM and DEP for 3 weeks (subacute model). Interference with eosinophils was performed by intraperitoneal administration of anti-IL-5 (TRFK5), which neutralizes IL-5. Interference with neutrophils and neutrophil elastase was performed by intraperitoneal anti-Ly6G and sivelestat administration, respectively. Outcome parameters included eosinophils subsets (homeostatic EOS and inflammatory EOS), proinflammatory cytokines, goblet cell hyperplasia and airway hyperresponsiveness.
resultsThe administration of anti-IL-5 significantly decreased eosinophilic responses, affecting both inflammatory and homeostatic eosinophil subsets, upon subacute HDM + DEP exposure while BAL neutrophils, NET formation and other asthma features remained present. Neutrophils were significantly reduced after anti-Ly6G administration in BALF, lung and blood without affecting the eosinophilic inflammation upon HDM + DEP exposure. Sivelestat treatment tended to decrease BALF inflammation, including eosinophils, upon HDM + DEP exposure, but did not affect lung inflammation.
conclusionInhibition of IL-5 signalling, but not neutrophil interventions, significantly attenuates eosinophilic inflammation in a mouse model of mixed granulocytic asthma, elicited by air pollution exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.