Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39875953›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2025

Early phosphate changes as potential indicator of unreadiness for artificial feeding: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT.

C Lauwers, L Langouche, P J Wouters, A Wilmer, G Van den Berghe, M P Casaer, J Gunst

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Core outcome sets and trials of nutrition and metabolism interventions.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C LauwersClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
L LangoucheClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
P J WoutersClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
A WilmerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
G Van den BergheClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
M P Casaer *Clinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. michael.casaer@uzleuven.be.
J GunstClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

C2 KU Leuven C24/17/070HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council AdvG-2017-785806KU Leuven STG/23/032Methusalem program of the Flemish Government METH/14/06Research Foundation-Flanders, Belgium G069421NResearch Foundation-Flanders - senior clinical investigator fellowship 1832822NResearch Foundation-Flanders - senior clinical investigator fellowship 1842724N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs compared to withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) until one week after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, Early PN prolonged ICU dependency in the EPaNIC randomized controlled trial (RCT). The Refeeding RCT showed improved outcome by temporary macronutrient restriction in ICU patients developing refeeding hypophosphatemia, defined as a phosphate decrease of > 0.16 mmol/L to levels < 0.65 mmol/L. We hypothesized that early phosphate changes may identify critically ill patients who are harmed by Early PN, and that dynamic phosphate changes are more discriminative than an absolute threshold for hypophosphatemia.

methodsIn this secondary analysis of the EPaNIC RCT, we studied whether absolute hypophosphatemia (AHP; < 0.65 mmol/L on the second ICU-day), relative hypophosphatemia (RHP; > 0.16 mmol/L decrease over the first 2 ICU-days), or a combination of both (CHP) interacted with the randomized nutritional strategy for its impact on outcome, adjusted for risk factors. In case of significant interaction, we studied whether the respective change could be predicted by baseline characteristics.

resultsOf 3520 patients with available phosphate measurements, AHP developed in 9.1%, RHP in 23.7%, and CHP in 5.3% of patients. RHP, but not AHP or CHP, interacted with the randomized intervention for its impact on outcome (p = 0.01). In RHP patients, Early PN independently associated with a lower likelihood of an earlier discharge alive from ICU (adjusted HR 0.75 [0.65-0.87]). In patients without RHP, Early PN did not significantly associate with this outcome (adjusted HR 0.93 [0.86-1.00]). Development of RHP was only poorly predicted by admission characteristics (adjusted pseudo R-squared = 1.7%).

conclusionDevelopment of RHP may identify patients who are particularly harmed by early PN. Future studies should prospectively validate the potential of including RHP in a ready-to-feed indicator.

Indexed as

Parenteral NutritionPhosphatesAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansHypophosphatemiaIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPhosphatesCritical illnessHypophosphatemiaParenteral nutritionPhosphateRefeeding

Identifiers

PMID39875953
PMCPMC11773907

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.