ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Development and Validation of a Competitive Risk Model in Elderly Patients with Transitional Cell Bladder Carcinoma.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nomogram for predicting cancer-specific mortality risk in endometrial cancer after postoperative radiotherapy.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitional cell bladder carcinoma (tcBC) is the predominant form of bladder cancer, making up around 95% of reported cases. Prognostic factors for older individuals with tcBC differ from those affecting younger patients. The main purpose of this study was to establish a prognostic competing risk model for elderly patients with tcBC. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the SEER database, randomly assigning patients to training and validation groups. We applied proportional subdistribution hazard (SH) to assess risk factors for cancer-related mortality (CSM). A competitive risk model was created to predict cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with tcBC. Model validation involved evaluating the area under the receiver operating curve, the consistency index, and a calibration curve. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve was then used to compare mortality risk between high-risk and low-risk groups identified by the model. RESULTS This study randomly assigned 61 293 patients from the SEER database into training (42 905 patients) and validation (18 388 patients) groups in a 7: 3 ratio. Using a proportional subdistribution hazards model, we identified prognostic risk factors such as age, race, sex, marital status, TNM staging, grade, and metastatic status in brain, bone, liver, and lung. We developed a competitive risk model to predict 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in elderly tcBC patients, achieving consistency index (C-index) values of 0.814 and 0.815 for the training and validation groups, respectively. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis revealed 5-year survival probabilities of 35.1% (high-risk) and 42.2% (low-risk) in the training group, with similar rates of 35.7% and 42.0% in the validation group, both showing statistically significant differences (log-rank P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS We successfully established a competitive risk model for forecasting cancer-specific survival in elderly tcBC patients, primarily relying on these identified risk factors. The validation outcomes indicate the model's accuracy and dependability, making it a highly efficient predictive instrument. This tool enables making personalized clinical decisions for both medical professionals and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.