SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2024
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation may improve cognitive deficits in neuropsychiatric diseases-a systematic review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Research advances in the microbiota‑gut‑brain axis and Parkinson's disease (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Advances in Targeting Central Cholinergic Dysfunction for Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Pharmacotherapy to Neuromodulation.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- A Review of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Disease: Comprehensive Theory and Evidence for Mechanisms of Action.Comprehensive physiology · 2026Review
- Coupling auditory cues and bilateral transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait: an open-label feasibility study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Therapeutic potential of vagus nerve stimulation in neurodegenerative diseases: research progress and mechanisms.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation reduces total striatal GABA+ content, increases DLPFC Glu content, and facilitates early-phase motor learning.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Neuromodulation in Neurodegenerative Disease: Precision in Chaos, Learning in Loss.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Gut-brain axis modulation in remote rehabilitation of Parkinson's disease: reconstructing the fecal metabolome and nigral network connectivity.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in healthy individuals, stroke, and Parkinson's disease: a narrative review of safety, parameters, and efficacy.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has emerged as a novel noninvasive adjunct therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), yet no quantitative analysis had been conducted to assess its therapeutic effect. Objectives: This review aimed to investigate the efficacy of tVNS on motor function, other potential clinical targets and its safety in various treatment conditions. Methods: We searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved treating PD patients with tVNS. Primary outcome was motor functions, including severity of motor signs, functional mobility and balance, and gait parameters. Secondary outcomes were cognition, emotion, sleep related impairments, patient reported non-motor outcomes, and any adverse events. All outcomes were classified and analyzed according to the treatment duration and medication condition of an included study. Risk of bias was evaluated by referencing Cochrane risk of bias tool 1.0. Data was analyzed by Revman 5.4. Results: 6 RCTs with 176 PD patient were included. Several motor functions and non-motor functions measured during on-medication condition (severity of motor signs -0.48 [95% CI -0.93, -0.04], gait -0.48 [95% CI -0.85, -0.1], patients reported non-motor outcomes -0.4 [95% CI -0.78, -0.03]), improved significantly. However, verbal fluency, sleep-related impairment, and fatigue were negatively impacted by tVNS during on-medication condition. No distinct adverse events were reported. Conclusion: tVNS is a relatively safe adjunct treatment for PD. It has small to moderate therapeutic effects on motor functions and may negatively impact on a few other outcomes. Quality level of the evidence is low and further research is warranted. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42024503322 (PROSPERO).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.