Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39877940›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Quantifying Bone Collagen Fingerprint Variation Between Species.

Andrew Baker, Michael Buckley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew BakerManchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Michael BuckleyManchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-8213

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011208/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen is the most ubiquitous protein in the animal kingdom and one of the most abundant proteins on Earth. Despite having a relatively repetitive amino acid sequence motif that enables its triple helical structure, in type 1 collagen, that dominates skin and bone, there is enough variation for its increasing use for the biomolecular species identification of animal tissues processed or degraded beyond the amenability of DNA-based analyses. In recent years, this has been most commonly achieved through the technique of collagen peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) known as ZooMS (Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry), applied to the analysis of tens of thousands of samples across over one hundred studies in the past decade alone. However, a robust means to quantify variation between these fingerprints remains elusive, despite being increasingly required due to the shift towards a wider range of wild fauna and those that are more distantly related from currently known sequences. This is particularly problematic in fish due to their greater sequence variation. Here we evaluate the quantification of the relative closeness of collagen fingerprints between families using ANOSIM and a modified SIMPER analysis, incorporating relative peak intensity. Our results show a clear correlation between sequence differentiation and statistical distance of PMFs, indicating that the additional complexity of type 1 collagen in fish could directly affect the efficacy of biomolecular techniques such as ZooMS. Furthermore, this multivariate statistical analysis demonstrates that PMFs in fish are substantively more distinct than those of mammalian or amphibian taxa.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesCollagenPeptide MappingAnimalsFishesMass SpectrometryCollagen

Identifiers

PMID39877940
PMCPMC11969642

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.