ArticleMedical physics2025
Radiogenomic explainable AI with neural ordinary differential equation for identifying post-SRS brain metastasis radionecrosis.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Explainable Deep Model for Risk Scoring and Accurate Radionecrosis Identification Following Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Prognostic Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Clinical Management of Brain Metastases (BMs).Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in the task of segmentation and classification of brain metastases images: current challenges and future opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used for managing brain metastases (BMs), but an adverse effect, radionecrosis, complicates post-SRS management. Differentiating radionecrosis from tumor recurrence non-invasively remains a major clinical challenge, as conventional imaging techniques often necessitate surgical biopsy for accurate diagnosis. Machine learning and deep learning models have shown potential in distinguishing radionecrosis from tumor recurrence. However, their clinical adoption is hindered by a lack of explainability, limiting understanding and trust in their diagnostic decisions. PURPOSE: To utilize a novel neural ordinary differential equation (NODE) model for discerning BM post-SRS radionecrosis from recurrence. This approach integrates image-deep features, genomic biomarkers, and non-image clinical parameters within a synthesized latent feature space. The trajectory of each data sample towards the diagnosis decision can be visualized within this feature space, offering a new angle on radiogenomic data analysis foundational for AI explainability.
methodsBy hypothesizing that deep feature extraction can be modeled as a spatiotemporally continuous process, we designed a novel model based on heavy ball NODE (HBNODE) in which deep feature extraction was governed by a second-order ODE. This approach enabled tracking of deep neural network (DNN) behavior by solving the HBNODE and observing the stepwise derivative evolution. Consequently, the trajectory of each sample within the Image-Genomic-Clinical (I-G-C) space became traceable. A decision-making field (F) was reconstructed within the feature space, with its gradient vectors directing the data samples' trajectories and intensities showing the potential. The evolution of F reflected the cumulative feature contributions at intermediate states to the final diagnosis, enabling quantitative and dynamic comparisons of the relative contribution of each feature category over time. A velocity curve was designed to determine key intermediate states (locoregional ∇F = 0) that are most predictive. Subsequently, a non-parametric model aggregated the optimal solutions from these key states to predict outcomes. Our dataset included 90 BMs from 62 NSCLC patients, and 3-month post-SRS T1+c MR image features, seven NSCLC genomic features, and seven clinical features were analyzed. An 8:2 train/test assignment was employed, and five independent models were trained to ensure robustness. Performance was benchmarked in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and ROC
resultsThe temporal evolution of gradient vectors and potential fields in F suggested that clinical features contribute the most during the initial stages of the HBNODE implementation, followed by imagery features taking dominance in the latter ones, while genomic features contribute the least throughout the process. The HBNODE model successfully identified and assembled key intermediate states, exhibiting competitive performance with an ROC
conclusionThe HBNODE model effectively identifies BM radionecrosis from recurrence, enhancing explainability within XAI frameworks. Its performance encourages further exploration in clinical settings and suggests potential applicability across various XAI domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.