Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39879512›Full record

ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2025

IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER: A 3-YEAR ANALYSIS.

Amanda Juliani Arneiro, Marina Alessandra Pereira, André Roncon Dias, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda Juliani ArneiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8759-6422
Marina Alessandra PereiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6865-0988
André Roncon DiasUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-4916
Ulysses Ribeiro JuniorUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-7347
Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille RamosUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-7858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has overloaded healthcare systems worldwide. Other diseases, such as neoplasms, including gastric cancer, remained prevalent and had their treatment compromised.

aimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of gastric cancer and adherence to the recommended preoperative COVID-19 screening protocol.

methodsA retrospective study evaluated patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical treatment between 2015 and 2023.

resultsA total of 769 patients with gastric cancer were evaluated and organized into two groups: (i) pre-COVID group and (ii) COVID group. The pre-COVID group consisted of 527 patients operated on between 2015 and 2019, and the COVID group consisted of 242 patients from 2020 to 2023. The average number of surgical procedures per year in the pre-COVID group was 105 and 81 in the COVID group. There was a statistically significant difference between ASA classification (p=0.002) and clinical staging (p=0.015), which were worse in the COVID group. We observed an increase in diagnostic surgeries (p=0.026), with an increase in the minimally invasive route (p<0.001). In patients undergoing curative surgery, there was a greater indication for postoperative ICU (p=0.022) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p<0.001). There was no difference in 30- and 90-day mortality.

conclusionsThe surgical and oncological outcomes for patients operated on during the pandemic remained uncompromised, even though many presented with more advanced initial stages and poorer clinical performance. High adherence to protocols and a low rate of complications related to coronavirus indicate that surgeries were performed safely during this period.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCOVID-19Stomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39879512
PMCPMC11774094

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.