ReviewCell reports. Medicine2025
Latest clinical frontiers related to autism diagnostic strategies.
Review in Cell reports. Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Reactive to Proactive Healthcare: Synergizing Wearable Biomarkers and Machine Learning in Digital Therapeutics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Body weight in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- Prediction models for highly scalable technology-assisted differential diagnostics of autism spectrum disorder.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Contrastive and Transfer Learning for Aligned Multimodal Neuroimaging Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Child and adolescent psychiatry: challenges, solutions, opportunities, and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of a Scenario-Based Approach to Early Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
- Real-world application of an eye-tracking device for autism screening and diagnosis: a short report from public demonstrations in Qatar, Dubai and the U.S.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics reveals microbial genomic variants driving altered host-microbe interactions in autism spectrum disorder.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnosing ASD in Children Aged 6-18: Gender Differences and the Diagnostic Process.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Oral microbiome dysbiosis in autism spectrum disorder: the oral-gut-brain axis and future perspectives: a narrative review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Neuroinflammatory mechanisms and pharmacological advances in autism spectrum disorder: from inflammatory pathways to targeted interventions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Acoustic analysis of vowel production in adults with autism spectrum disorder: beyond the notion of a unitary autistic voice.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The role of machine learning in autism spectrum disorder assessment and management.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Melatonin Improves Intestinal Barrier Impairment in a Mouse Model of Autism Spectrum Disorder.Biology · 2025Article
- Acceptability and Pilot Validation of the Diagnostic Autism Spectrum Interview (DASI-2) Compared with Clinical and ADOS-2 Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biogenic Amine Metabolism and Its Genetic Variations in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Overview.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Cooking for disability: a pilot study on nutritional interventions for mental health support in adults with autism spectrum disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in children.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of autism is currently based on the developmental history, direct observation of behavior, and reported symptoms, supplemented by rating scales/interviews/structured observational evaluations-which is influenced by the clinician's knowledge and experience-with no established diagnostic biomarkers. A growing body of research has been conducted over the past decades to improve diagnostic accuracy. Here, we provide an overview of the current diagnostic assessment process as well as of recent and ongoing developments to support diagnosis in terms of genetic evaluation, telemedicine, digital technologies, use of machine learning/artificial intelligence, and research on candidate diagnostic biomarkers. Genetic testing can meaningfully contribute to the assessment process, but caution is required when interpreting negative results, and more work is needed to strengthen the transferability of genetic information into clinical practice. Digital diagnostic and machine-learning-based analyses are emerging as promising approaches, but larger and more robust studies are needed. To date, there are no available diagnostic biomarkers. Moving forward, international collaborations may help develop multimodal datasets to identify biomarkers, ensure reproducibility, and support clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.