SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025
The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Inertial Measurement Units in Medicine: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning of wrist accelerometry from UK Biobank data identifies early movement signatures of knee osteoarthritis up to 5 years before diagnosis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Exploring associations between energetic and anthropometric characteristics with front crawl technique in young male swimmers using IMU sensors: a preliminary study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Distributed Precision Stroke Care: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Stroke Management Using Multimodal Sensor Data.Stroke · 2026Review
- Proof-of-Concept of IMU-Based Detection of ICU-Relevant Agitation Motion Patterns in Healthy Volunteers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automatic identification of postural transitions using a single inertial measurement unit and dynamic time warping: a pilot study in healthy individuals and people with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- IMU-based rotator cuff injury recognition with varying configurations and combinations.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in applications of artificial intelligence-assisted Raman spectroscopy in diagnosis of cancers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Transformative Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Internal Medicine: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Horizons for Urban Health.Juntendo medical journal · 2025Review
- Use of mHealth interventions to enhance self-regulation and self-efficacy in individuals living with obesity: Scoping review.Digital healthReview
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has already revolutionized the analysis of image, text, and tabular data, bringing significant advances across many medical sectors. Now, by combining with wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs), AI could transform health care again by opening new opportunities in patient care and medical research.
objectiveThis systematic review aims to evaluate the integration of AI models with wearable IMUs in health care, identifying current applications, challenges, and future opportunities. The focus will be on the types of models used, the characteristics of the datasets, and the potential for expanding and enhancing the use of this technology to improve patient care and advance medical research.
methodsThis study examines this synergy of AI models and IMU data by using a systematic methodology, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, to explore 3 core questions: (1) Which medical fields are most actively researching AI and IMU data? (2) Which models are being used in the analysis of IMU data within these medical fields? (3) What are the characteristics of the datasets used for in this fields?
resultsThe median dataset size is of 50 participants, which poses significant limitations for AI models given their dependency on large datasets for effective training and generalization. Furthermore, our analysis reveals the current dominance of machine learning models in 76% on the surveyed studies, suggesting a preference for traditional models like linear regression, support vector machine, and random forest, but also indicating significant growth potential for deep learning models in this area. Impressively, 93% of the studies used supervised learning, revealing an underuse of unsupervised learning, and indicating an important area for future exploration on discovering hidden patterns and insights without predefined labels or outcomes. In addition, there was a preference for conducting studies in clinical settings (77%), rather than in real-life scenarios, a choice that, along with the underapplication of the full potential of wearable IMUs, is recognized as a limitation in terms of practical applicability. Furthermore, the focus of 65% of the studies on neurological issues suggests an opportunity to broaden research scope to other clinical areas such as musculoskeletal applications, where AI could have significant impacts.
conclusionsIn conclusion, the review calls for a collaborative effort to address the highlighted challenges, including improvements in data collection, increasing dataset sizes, a move that inherently pushes the field toward the adoption of more complex deep learning models, and the expansion of the application of AI models on IMU data methodologies across various medical fields. This approach aims to enhance the reliability, generalizability, and clinical applicability of research findings, ultimately improving patient outcomes and advancing medical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.