Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881009›Full record

ArticlePituitary2025

Medical management pathways for Cushing's disease in pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOEs).

A Giustina, M M Uygur, S Frara, A Barkan, N R Biermasz, P Chanson, P Freda, M Gadelha, L Haberbosch, U B Kaiser and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07603466 (Combination Osilodrostat and Cabergoline Versus Osilodrostat Alone in Cushing's Disease in Iraq), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07603466 phase4enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Combination Osilodrostat and Cabergoline Versus Osilodrostat Alone in Cushing's Disease in Iraq: Assessment of Efficacy and Safety

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BasrahRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsCushing Disease Due to Increased ACTH SecretionArmsosilodrostat, osilodrostat and cabergoline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

A GiustinaInstitute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and San Raffaele IRCCS Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, 20132, Italy. giustina.andrea@hsr.it.
M M UygurInstitute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and San Raffaele IRCCS Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, 20132, Italy.
S FraraInstitute of Endocrine and Metabolic Sciences, San Raffaele Vita-Salute University and San Raffaele IRCCS Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, 20132, Italy.
A BarkanDivision of Endocrinology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
N R BiermaszCenter for Endocrine Tumors Leiden, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P ChansonPhysiologie et Physiopathologie Endocriniennes, Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction et Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de l'Hypophyse HYPO, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, APHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Paris, France.
P FredaDepartment of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
M GadelhaInstituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer, Secretaria Estadual de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
L HaberboschDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, European Reference Network on Rare Endocrine Diseases (ENDO-ERN), Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
U B KaiserBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
S LambertsErasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E LawsPituitary/Neuroendocrine Center, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
L B NachtigallNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
V PopovicMedical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
K SchilbachMedizinische Klinik & Poliklinik IV, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany.
A J van der LelyPituitary Center Rotterdam, Endocrinology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J A H WassDepartment of Endocrinology, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
S MelmedPituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
F F CasanuevaDivision of Endocrinology, Santiago de Compostela University and Ciber OBN, Santiago, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA recent update of consensus guidelines for the management of Cushing's disease (CD) included indications for medical therapy. However, there is limited evidence regarding their implementation in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate current medical therapy approaches by expert pituitary centers through an audit conducted to validate the criteria of Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence (PTCOEs) and provide an initial standard of medical care for CD.

methodsBased on the activities of nine international PTCOEs between 2018 and 2020, we evaluated patients under medical treatment and their biochemical control rates.

resultsThe median number of active patients with CD per center was 117 (35-279), with a median number of 10 new patients with CD managed annually in the endocrinology units of PTCOEs (4-42). The median percentage of patients with CD receiving medical treatment was 13.3% (4.8-82.9). Ketoconazole was the most frequently used drug, with a median rate of usage of 26.5% (5-66.7) of those receiving medical therapy. The median rates of metyrapone and pasireotide use were 17.2% (0-50) and 9.3% (0-51.7), respectively. For cabergoline and osilodrostat, therapy, the median rates of use were 2.8% (0-33.3), and 1.7% (0-25), respectively. Combination therapy was reported to be utilized in 13.6% (0-45.5) of medically treated patients. Mifepristone was used in a single center, representing 1.1% of its medically treated patients. Overall, the median control rate in patients with CD receiving medical treatment was 75% (10-100).

conclusionAdrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors were the most commonly used medications amongst the centers. Despite the use of combination therapy, up to 25% of patients did not achieve disease control even in PTCOEs, highlighting the need for either more efficient combination therapies or novel therapeutic options.

Indexed as

Pituitary ACTH HypersecretionPituitary NeoplasmsAdultCabergolineFemaleHumansKetoconazoleMaleMetyraponeMiddle AgedSomatostatinCabergolineKetoconazoleMetyraponepasireotideSomatostatinCabergolineControl rateCushing’s diseaseKetoconazoleMetyraponeMifepristoneOsilodrostatPasireotidePTCOEs

Identifiers

PMID39881009
PMCPMC11779774

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.