ArticleBMC cancer2025
The implementation and side effect management of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic oncology: a JAGO/NOGGO survey.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into routine gynecologic cancer treatment requires a thorough understanding of how to manage immune-related adverse events (irAEs) to ensure patient safety. However, reports on real-world clinical experience in the management of ICIs in gynecologic oncology are very limited. The aim of this survey was to provide a real-world overview of the experiences and the current state of irAE management of ICIs in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.
methodsWe designed a questionnaire consisting of 34 items focused on physicans' clinical experiences with ICIs and their management of irAEs. The survey was distributed between October 2022 and May 2023 to medical professionals with experience in the field of gynecologic oncology.
resultsA total of 221 gynecologists participated in the study. Most respondents (n = 130, 59.1%) were primarily engaged in gynecologic oncology at the time of the survey, with an average of ten years of clinical experience. Individual experiences with regard to irAEs varied significantly. When asked which irAEs they had observed "frequently" or "very frequently", respondents most commonly reported thyroiditis (37.2%), followed by skin reactions (23.6%), and pneumonitis (10.6%). A total of n = 16 (7.4%) reported at least one death of a patient due to irAEs. Feeling "unconfident" or "very unconfident" about managing irAEs was reported by 35.6% (n = 78). With regard to clinical management of adverse events after discontinuation of treatment, 32.4% (n = 68) ceased to inquire about irAEs after six months.
conclusionThe results of this survey provide valuable insights into physicians' real-world experiences with irAEs associated with ICI treatment. Dealing with serious immune-related and potentially life-threatening side effects has become a routine aspect of clinical practice. Many physicians, however, express a lack of sufficient familiarity with irAEs and their management. Therefore, it is essential to improve medical education, specialized oncological training, and close interdisciplinary collaboration to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.