Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881821›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

CECT-Based Radiomic Nomogram of Different Machine Learning Models for Differentiating Malignant and Benign Solid-Containing Renal Masses.

Lu Qian, BinHai Fu, Hong He, Shan Liu, RenCai Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lu Qian *Department of Pathology, the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650032, People's Republic of China.
BinHai Fu *Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, the Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650032, People's Republic of China.
Hong HeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, the Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650032, People's Republic of China.
Shan LiuDepartment of Pathology, the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650032, People's Republic of China.
RenCai LuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, the Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650032, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2742-4108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the value of a radiomic nomogram based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for differentiating benign and malignant solid-containing renal masses. Materials and Methods: A total of 122 patients with pathologically confirmed benign (n=47) or malignant (n=75) solid-containing renal masses were enrolled in this study. Radiomic features were extracted from the arterial, venous and delayed phases and further analysed by dimensionality reduction and selection. Four mainstream machine learning algorithm training models, namely, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbour (kNN), light gradient boosting (LightGBM) and logistic regression (LR), were constructed to determine the best classifier model. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the best clinical characteristics for constructing a clinical model. The radiomic and clinical signatures were integrated to construct a combined radiomic nomogram model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of the radiomic nomogram, radiomic signature, and clinical model. Results: Thirteen radiomic features were selected for the development of the radiomic signature. Among the various radiomic models, the LR model demonstrated superior predictive efficiency and robustness, yielding an AUC of 0.952 in the training cohort and 0.887 in the test cohort. The AUC for the clinical model was 0.854 in the training cohort and 0.747 in the test cohort. Furthermore, the radiomic nomogram, which incorporated sex, age, alcohol consumption history, and the radiomic signature, exhibited excellent discriminative performance, yielding an AUC of 0.973 in the training cohort and 0.900 in the test cohort. Conclusion: The radiomic nomogram based on CECT offers a promising and noninvasive approach for distinguishing malignant from benign solid renal masses. This tool can be used to guide treatment strategies effectively and can provide valuable insights for clinicians.

Indexed as

computed tomographymachine learningradiomicsrenal neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID39881821
PMCPMC11776415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.