ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025
Anamnesis Checklist for Informed Oral Contraceptive Choices: A Spanish Perspective.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation and Feasibility of the VALORA Checklist for Structured Anamnesis in Oral Contraceptive Counseling in Spain: Results from a Survey-Based Pilot Study.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop an anamnesis checklist for oral contraceptive (OC) choice focused on their safety profile and associated risk factors. Study Design: This study involved eight health care professionals in Spain, including six gynecologists and two internists, selected for their expertise in contraception counseling. We employed the design-thinking process, structured in five phases: empathizing with patients' needs, defining key areas of impact, devising innovative solutions, prototyping ideas into testable proposals, and validating prototypes. This process involved an analysis of the available literature, online discussions, and an online survey to evaluate importance and frequency of variables in anamnesis. Medians were computed for each variable, and the study group collaboratively determined the variables to include in the anamnesis checklist. Results: Women must be informed about contraceptive options, according to health care professionals. Body mass index, smoking status, blood pressure, and personal history were identified and prioritized as variables to consider during OC counseling. Participants emphasized the need to individualize the treatment, highlightling the safety profile of progestin-only pills over OCs due to the lack of increased venous thromboembolism risk. Conclusions: The study emphasizes the importance of an anamnesis prior to prescribing an oral hormonal contraceptive, as well as the most relevant risk factors that should be analyzed. A checklist was developed to facilitate safe OC prescribing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.