Evidence mapPaperPMID 39882296Full record

ReviewBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2024

Health policy to address disease-related malnutrition: a scoping review.

Katherine L Ford, Carlota Basualdo-Hammond, Roseann Nasser, Melita Avdagovska, Heather Keller, Ainsley Malone, Judy D Bauer, M Isabel T D Correia, Diana Cardenas, Leah Gramlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katherine L FordDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8620-9360
Carlota Basualdo-HammondClinical Nutrition Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Roseann NasserClinical Nutrition Services, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Melita AvdagovskaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Heather KellerDepartment of Kinesiology & Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Ainsley MaloneAmerican Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Judy D BauerDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
M Isabel T D CorreiaDepartment of Surgery, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Diana CardenasNutrition, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Leah GramlichDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractBackground: Health policies promote optimal care, yet policies that address disease-related malnutrition (DRM) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review to identify literature on existing and planned policy to address DRM in children or adults and explore the settings, contexts and actors of DRM policy. Methods: A search strategy comprising DRM and policy keywords was applied to eight databases on 24 February 2023. Articles that addressed DRM and policy were selected for inclusion after two independent reviews. The health policy triangle (HPT) framework (ie, actors, content, contexts and processes considerations for policy) guided data extraction and thematic analysis. Results: A total of 67 articles were included out of the 37 196 identified. Some articles (n=14) explored established policies at the local level related to food and mealtime, nutrition care practices, oral nutritional supplement prescribing or reimbursement. Other articles gave direction or rationale for DRM policy. As part of the HPT, actors included researchers, advocacy groups and DRM champions while content pertained to standard processes for nutrition care such as screening, assessment, intervention and monitoring. Contexts included acute care and care home settings with a focus on paediatrics, adults, older adults. Processes identified were varied and influenced by the type of policy (eg, local, national, international) and its goal (eg, advocating, developing, implementing). Discussion: There is a paucity of global DRM policy. Nutrition screening, assessment, intervention and monitoring are consistently identified as important to DRM policy. Decision makers are important actors and should consider context, content and processes to develop and mobilise DRM policy to improve nutrition care. Future efforts need to prioritise the development and implementation of policies addressing DRM.

Indexed as

malnutrition

Identifiers

PMID39882296
PMCPMC11773663

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.