ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Graph contrastive learning of subcellular-resolution spatial transcriptomics improves cell type annotation and reveals critical molecular pathways.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal decoding of skin biology: development, aging, disease, and regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Spatial omics advances for in situ RNA biology.Molecular cell · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics (iST), such as MERFISH, CosMx SMI, and Xenium, quantify gene expression level across cells in space, but more importantly, they directly reveal the subcellular distribution of RNA transcripts at the single-molecule resolution. The subcellular localization of RNA molecules plays a crucial role in the compartmentalization-dependent regulation of genes within individual cells. Understanding the intracellular spatial distribution of RNA for a particular cell type thus not only improves the characterization of cell identity but also is of paramount importance in elucidating unique subcellular regulatory mechanisms specific to the cell type. However, current cell type annotation approaches of iST primarily utilize gene expression information while neglecting the spatial distribution of RNAs within cells. In this work, we introduce a semi-supervised graph contrastive learning method called Focus, the first method, to the best of our knowledge, that explicitly models RNA's subcellular distribution and community to improve cell type annotation. Focus demonstrates significant improvements over state-of-the-art algorithms across a range of spatial transcriptomics platforms, achieving improvements up to 27.8% in terms of accuracy and 51.9% in terms of F1-score for cell type annotation. Furthermore, Focus enjoys the advantages of intricate cell type-specific subcellular spatial gene patterns and providing interpretable subcellular gene analysis, such as defining the gene importance score. Importantly, with the importance score, Focus identifies genes harboring strong relevance to cell type-specific pathways, indicating its potential in uncovering novel regulatory programs across numerous biological systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.