ArticlePloS one2025
An efficient interpretable framework for unsupervised low, very low and extreme birth weight detection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting low birth weight is crucial for early identification of at-risk pregnancies which are associated with significant neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality risks. This study presents an efficient and interpretable framework for unsupervised detection of low, very low, and extreme birth weights. While traditional approaches to managing class imbalance require labeled data, our study explores the use of unsupervised learning to detect anomalies indicative of low birth weight scenarios. This method is particularly valuable in contexts where labeled data are scarce or labels for the anomaly class are not available, allowing for preliminary insights and detection that can inform further data labeling and more focused supervised learning efforts. We employed fourteen different anomaly detection algorithms and evaluated their performance using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUCROC) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUCPR) metrics. Our experiments demonstrated that One Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM) and Empirical-Cumulative-distribution-based Outlier Detection (ECOD) effectively identified anomalies across different birth weight categories. The OCSVM attained an AUCROC of 0.72 and an AUCPR of 0.0253 for extreme LBW detection, while the ECOD model showed competitive performance with an AUCPR of 0.045 for very low LBW cases. Additionally, a novel feature perturbation technique was introduced to enhance the interpretability of the anomaly detection models by providing insights into the relative importance of various prenatal features. The proposed interpretation methodology is validated by the clinician experts and reveals promise for early intervention strategies and improved neonatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.