Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39883838›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Optimal strategies for correcting merotelic chromosome attachments in anaphase.

Evgenii Kliuchnikov, Kenneth A Marx, Valeri Barsegov, Alex Mogilner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evgenii KliuchnikovDepartment of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854.ORCID 0000-0002-2410-2138
Kenneth A MarxDepartment of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854.
Valeri BarsegovDepartment of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854.
Alex MogilnerCourant Institute for Mathematical Sciences and Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10012.ORCID 0000-0002-9310-3812

Funding

Mechanisms of mechano-chemical rupture of blood clots and thrombiR01HL148227 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PUROHIT, PRASHANT KISHORE · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) HL148227National Science Foundation (NSF) DMS 1953430NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate chromosome segregation in mitosis depends on proper connections of sister chromatids, through microtubules, to the opposite poles of the early mitotic spindle. Transiently, many inaccurate connections are formed and rapidly corrected throughout the mitotic stages, but a small number of merotelic connections, in which a chromatid is connected to both spindle poles, remain lagging at the spindle's equator in anaphase. Most of the lagging chromatids are eventually moved to one or the other pole, likely by a combination of microtubules' turnover and the brute force of pulling by the microtubules' majority from the one pole against the microtubules' minority from the other pole. We use computer simulations from two stochastic models (1D and full 3D CellDynaMo model) combining force balances and microtubules' dynamics for the lagging chromatids to investigate what maximizes the percentage of segregated laggards. We find that a) brute force tug-of-war with slow (< 0.0001 s

Indexed as

AnaphaseChromosome SegregationModels, BiologicalChromatidsComputer SimulationHumansMicrotubulesSpindle Apparatus3D computational modelinganaphasemerotelic errorstug-of-war

Identifiers

PMID39883838
PMCPMC11804472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.