ReviewNeurology2025
Reconstructing Covert Consciousness: Neural Decoding as a Novel Consciousness Assessment.
Review in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Covert Consciousness: Epistemic Limits of Its Definition and Detection.Neurocritical care · 2026Review
- Disorders of consciousness diagnosis, interventions, and prognostication for the intensivist: Report of the 2025 ISICEM roundtable.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Rapid cortical mapping with cross-participant encoding models.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining the level of consciousness in patients with brain injury-and more fundamentally, establishing what they can experience-is ethically and clinically impactful. Patient behaviors may unreliably reflect their level of consciousness: a subset of unresponsive patients demonstrate covert consciousness by willfully modulating their brain activity to commands through fMRI or EEG. However, current paradigms for assessing covert consciousness remain fundamentally limited because they are insensitive, rely on imperfect assumptions of functional neuroanatomy, and do not reflect the spectrum of conscious experience. Neural decoding, in which stimuli and concepts are reconstructed from brain activity, offers a novel approach to covert consciousness assessment that overcomes many of these limitations. In this article, we discuss the current state of covert consciousness assessments, their shortcomings, the state of the science in neural decoding, the potential application of neural decoding to disorders of consciousness, and future directions that may help realize this potential. To do so, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases for pertinent articles published between January 1990 and September 2024, using the search terms "covert consciousness," "cognitive motor dissociation," "neural decoding," and "semantic decoding." Redefining covert consciousness with neural decoding may improve sensitivity, enhance granularity, and more directly address the question of what patients can experience after brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.