Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885256›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Patterns of physical activity in hunter-gatherer children compared with US and UK children.

Luke Kretschmer, Mark Dyble, Nikhil Chaudhary, David Bann, Gul Deniz Salali

Abstract readComparative StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luke KretschmerCentre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, UCL, London, UK. luke.kretschmer.18@alumni.ucl.ac.uk.
Mark DybleDepartment of Archaeology, Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Nikhil ChaudharyDepartment of Archaeology, Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
David BannCentre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, UCL, London, UK.
Gul Deniz SalaliDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, 14 Taviton Street, London, UK. guldeniz.salali@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

British Academy SRG\171409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary hunter-gatherers are highly active, but little is known about physical activity levels in hunter-gatherer children. We analysed 150 days of accelerometer data from 51 BaYaka hunter-gatherer children (aged 3-18) in the Republic of Congo, comparing it with British and American children using samples from Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). BaYaka children were highly active, engaging in over 3 h of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) daily, surpassing British adolescents by over 70 min. Unlike US children, whose activity diminished with age, BaYaka children's activity levels increased, irrespective of gender. This trend suggests that formal education may suppress activity among American children, a pattern not seen in the BaYaka community. Reflecting their foraging lifestyle, activity patterns varied within and between days in BaYaka children, a contrast to the more uniform daily activity observed in American children. Furthermore, our data challenges the concept of 'teenage chronotypes' prevalent in post-industrial societies, with adolescent BaYaka maintaining shorter sleep phases and later bedtimes, synchronized with sunrise. These findings highlight the impact of a foraging upbringing on children's activity levels, providing a benchmark for understanding childhood physical activity and wellbeing.

Indexed as

ExerciseNutrition SurveysAccelerometryAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCongoFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsUnited KingdomUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39885256
PMCPMC11782480

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.