ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between surgery and increased survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unraveling survival disparities in primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma: an analysis of race, socioeconomic factors, and treatment outcomes using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program (2000-2021).Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Novel Therapies in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2025Review
- The prognostic role of surgical resection in selected patients with primary CNS lymphoma based on voxel-wise analysis.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of surgery on the prognosis of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) using data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. A cohort of 5932 patients was analyzed, with 1466 undergoing surgical intervention (780 subtotal resection (STR), 686 gross total resection (GTR)) and 4466 receiving no surgery or biopsy only. The median age of the study population was 61.5 years. The median survival was 24.0 months for STR, 30.0 months for GTR, and 18.0 months for non-surgical patients (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for STR was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85, P < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.83, P < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS). For GTR, the adjusted HR was 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.80, P < 0.001) for OS and 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.82, P < 0.001) for CSS. These results remained robust even after subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses and propensity score matching (PSM). No significant interactions were observed in any subgroup. These findings indicate that surgery may improve the survival of patients with PCNSL, though further research is needed to confirm these findings. A key limitation is the inability to stratify patients by performance status and lesion number, critical for assessing resective surgery suitability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.