Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885413›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

COVID-19 status and utilisation of essential maternal and child healthcare services during the pandemic in Ahmedabad, India.

Sandul Yasobant, K Shruti Lekha, Ravina Tadvi, Bhavin Solanki, Walter Bruchhausen, Deepak Saxena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandul YasobantDepartment of Public Health Science, Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. yasobant@iiphg.org.
K Shruti LekhaCentre for One Health Education, Research & Development (COHERD), Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Opp. Air Force Head Quarters, Nr. Lekawada, Gandhinagar, 382042, Gujarat, India.
Ravina TadviCentre for One Health Education, Research & Development (COHERD), Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Opp. Air Force Head Quarters, Nr. Lekawada, Gandhinagar, 382042, Gujarat, India.
Bhavin SolankiDepartment of Health, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), Ahmedabad, India.
Walter BruchhausenGlobal Health, Institute for Hygiene & Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Deepak SaxenaDepartment of Public Health Science, Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BR 2522 4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to essential healthcare services is pertinent to the achievement of universal health coverage in any nation. The COVID-19 lockdown was used to mitigate the spread of the pandemic. Consequently, there was a reduction in the Utilisation of Basic Healthcare Services (UBHS) in diverse dimensions. However, variation existed in the UBHS by COVID-19 status, but the extent of this disparity has not been extensively addressed in Ahmedabad, India. Therefore, this study explores the relationship between COVID-19 status and utilisation of essential maternal and child healthcare services during the pandemic in Ahmedabad, India.

methodsA mixed-method approach was used for the data (both quantitative and qualitative) collection from November 2021 to October 2022. Four zones were purposefully selected from the 6 zones in Ahmedabad. The quantitative part of the study included pregnant women or those who had a baby delivery from April 2020 to October 2021 (n = 278), while 10 of these women participated in the qualitative part. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and binomial logistic regression (α = 0.05). A deductive approach was used to analyse the qualitative data.

resultsOf the total 278, almost 43% of the women were infected with COVID-19 during their pregnancy. Women who tested positive availed lesser antenatal care (ANC), and Postnatal care (PNC). There were diverse experiences documented regarding access to essential maternal and child healthcare services during the pandemic. Women without COVID-19 are more likely to receive maternal healthcare services, such as visits of any healthcare workers [aOR = 2.59 (1.03- 6.49)], counseling services [aOR = 1.92 (0.61- 6.06)], delivery at the planned place [aOR = 1.98 (0.99- 3.92)] as compared to those who are positive. Women without COVID-19 were more likely to be accompanied by healthcare workers during labor ([aOR = 2.91(1.04- 8.11) and to receive appropriate birth spacing counselling [aOR = 1.38 (0.7-2.71)].

conclusionUtilisation of essential maternal and child healthcare services was lower among women who were COVID-19 positive compared to those who were not. Social and health system determinants for disrupting healthcare services during the pandemic were fear of infection and unavailability of the health workforce. Health planners and policymakers are encouraged to take into consideration of these findings while building resilient health care for managing future pandemics.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesCOVID-19Health Services AccessibilityMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultChildFemaleHumansIndiaPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2Young AdultAhmedabadCOVID-19 pandemicDisruptionHealthcare service utilisationIndiaMaternal & child healthcare services

Identifiers

PMID39885413
PMCPMC11783857

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.