ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Fetal cardiac function in pregnancy affected by congenital heart disease: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05698277 (Automated Fetal Cardiac Function Parameters in Congenital Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Automated Fetal Cardiac Function Parameters in Congenital Heart Disease
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common fetal malformation, and it can result first in cardiac remodeling and dysfunction and later in cardiac failure and hydrops. A limited number of studies have evaluated cardiac function in fetuses affected by CHD. Functional parameters could potentially identify fetuses at risk of cardiac failure before its development. However, these techniques have not translated from research to clinical settings, due to a lack of standardization and poor repeatability. We seek to evaluate whether application of automated techniques to a cohort with fetal pathology could overcome these factors.
methodsA multicenter cohort study will be carried out in eight teaching hospitals across Europe, Australia, and Middle East. Based on a previous observed standard deviation, a total sample of 381 pregnancies is required to achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0.03 in mean myocardial performance index (MPI) with a two-sided type I error rate of 5%. After adjustments allowing for patient exclusions or incomplete datasets, a total of 330 healthy singleton pregnancies and 165 diagnosed with CHD will be recruited. Two fetal cardiac function evaluations at 19 + 6-28 + 6 and 32 + 6-36 + 6 weeks will be offered assessing automated pulsed wave doppler (PWD) MPI, spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) annular and septal plane excursion (TAPSE, MAPSE and SAPSE), alongside cardiac morphometric and Doppler evaluations of flow across the valves. A secondary nested case-control study will evaluate fetuses with hydrops compared to those without. Differences in functional parameters between cases and controls and over time will be assessed using generalized linear mixed models. Logistic regression will estimate the association between cardiac parameters and hydrops' incidence. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence as to whether automated functional parameters could be significantly different in pregnancy affected by CHD versus healthy pregnancies. The primary objective is to compare automated PWD-MPI and STIC TAPSE, MAPSE and SAPSE in fetuses affected by CHD versus healthy. The secondary objective is to estimate whether these automated parameters could improve the predictive value of the classical cardiovascular profile score in case of hydrops.
trial registrationThe study protocol has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System, identification number NCT05698277.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.