Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885463›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD-NET): a naturalistic pilot trial during the COVID-19 pandemic in a psychiatric outpatient department in Germany.

Elisabeth Kohls, Sabrina Baldofski, Julia Scholl, Oskar Flygare, Lina Lundström, Ursula Beyrich-Kolbus, Marc Steinbrecher, Christian Rück, Christine Rummel-Kluge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elisabeth KohlsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Sabrina BaldofskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Julia SchollDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Oskar FlygareCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lina LundströmCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ursula Beyrich-KolbusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Marc SteinbrecherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian RückCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christine Rummel-KlugeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. Christine.Rummel-Kluge@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is the gold-standard treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, access to CBT and specialized treatments is often limited. This pilot study describes the implementation of a guided Internet-Based CBT program (ICBT) for individuals seeking treatment for OCD in a psychiatric outpatient department in Leipzig, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to investigate the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the ICBT program for OCD.

methodsIn an open, naturalistic pilot trial, N = 57 patients with OCD received a 10-week ICBT program (called "OCD-NET"). It consisted of 10 different modules covering psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure with response prevention, and overall therapist support and guidance through the program. The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptance of the OCD-NET program assessed via recruitment and retention rate, adherence and user satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were OCD symptoms at the end of treatment, assessed using the self-report Obsessive Compulsive Inventory - Revised (OCI-R) and self-rated measures of depressive symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy, and psychological distress. Additionally, treatment credibility, working alliance, and satisfaction were assessed.

resultsOn average, participants completed 6.30 (SD = 3.21) modules, and n = 19 (33.9%) participants completed all 10 modules of the program. Overall, n = 45 (78.9%) were treatment completers (minimum 4 modules completed), n = 11 (19.3%) were non-completers, and n = 1 (1.8%) was a dropout. Satisfaction with the program was high, with a majority of participants indicating that they would recommend it to others (n = 56, 98.2%) and that it provided the support they needed (n = 49, 86.0%).Mixed-effect models showed a significant reduction in OCD symptoms (OCI-R), with large within-group effect sizes in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and completer analyses. In ITT analyses, the OCI-R decreased significantly with a within-group effect size of d = 1.13 (95% CI 0.88 - 1.38). At post-treatment, n = 17 (29.8%) participants showed a treatment response on the OCI-R (≥ 40% reduction). The treatment also resulted in statistically significant improvements in depressive symptoms (d = 0.90 [0.65; 1.15]) and self-efficacy (d = -0.27 [-0.53; -0.00]). No significant differences were observed in quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) or psychological distress (Mini-SCL GSI) scores between baseline and post-treatment, in either the ITT or completer analyses.

conclusionsThe OCD-NET program is overall highly acceptable and appears to meet patients' needs in routine care, even under pandemic constraints. ICBT with therapist guidance significantly reduces OCD and depressive symptoms in real world settings. The results also suggest that this ICBT program could be integrated into routine psychiatric outpatient treatments. However, future research should investigate how upscaling and sustainable implementation could be effectively achieved.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials register (DRKS): DRKS00021706, registration date: 15.05.2020.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCOVID-19Internet-Based InterventionObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsSARS-CoV-2Cognitive-behavioral therapyCOVID-19ICBTInternetOCDPsychiatric patientsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39885463
PMCPMC11783832

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.