ArticleBMC chemistry2025
Development and experimental validation of a machine learning model for the prediction of new antimalarials.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predicting Antileishmanial Activity of Plant-Derived Compounds Using Random Forest Modeling.microPublication biology · 2026Article
- In Silico Approach for Early Antimalarial Drug Discovery: De Novo Design of Virtual Multi-Strain Antiplasmodial Inhibitors.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Association between pollinosis and obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome in the US population: evidence from the NHANES database 2005-2018.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A large set of antimalarial molecules (N ~ 15k) was employed from ChEMBL to build a robust random forest (RF) model for the prediction of antiplasmodial activity. Rather than depending on high throughput screening (HTS) data, molecules tested at multiple doses against blood stages of Plasmodium falciparum were used for model development. The open-access and code-free KNIME platform was used to develop a workflow to train the model on 80% of data (N ~ 12k). The hyperparameter values were optimized to achieve the highest predictive accuracy with nine different molecular fingerprints (MFPs), among which Avalon MFPs (referred to as RF-1) provided the best results. RF-1 displayed 91.7% accuracy, 93.5% precision, 88.4% sensitivity and 97.3% area under the Receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for the remaining 20% test set. The predictive performance of RF-1 was comparable to that of the malaria inhibitor prediction platform (MAIP), a recently reported consensus model based on a large proprietary dataset. However, hits obtained from RF-1 and MAIP from a commercial library did not overlap, suggesting that these two models are complementary. Finally, RF-1 was used to screen small molecules under clinical investigations for repurposing. Six molecules were purchased, out of which two human kinase inhibitors were identified to have single-digit micromolar antiplasmodial activity. One of the hits (compound 1) was a potent inhibitor of β-hematin, suggesting the involvement of parasite hemozoin (Hz) synthesis in the parasiticidal effect. The training and test sets are provided as supplementary information, allowing others to reproduce this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.