Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39885743›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2024

Expert Stakeholder Perspectives on Emerging Technology for Neuroimaging Research with Highly Portable MRI: The Need for Guidance on Ethical, Legal, and Societal Issues.

Molly K Madzelan, Frances Lawrenz, Susan M Wolf, Francis X Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conducting Research with Highly Portable MRI in Community Settings: A Practical Guide to Navigating Ethical Issues and ELSI Checklist.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Molly K MadzelanFEDERATION OF ASSOCIATIONS IN BEHAVIORAL & BRAIN SCIENCES, WASHINGTON, DC, USA.
Frances LawrenzUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, USA.
Susan M WolfUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, USA.
Francis X ShenUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9029-1686

Funding

Highly Portable and Cloud-Enabled Neuroimaging Research: Confronting Ethics Challenges in Field Research with New PopulationsRF1MH123698 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LAWRENZ, FRANCES PATRICIA, SHEN, FRANCIS X · 2020 to 2020
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Portable MRI (pMRI) technology, which promises to transform brain imaging research by facilitating scanning in new geographic areas and the participation of new, diverse populations, raises many ethical, legal, and societal issues (ELSI). To understand this emerging pMRI ELSI landscape, we surveyed expert stakeholder views on ELSI challenges and solutions associated with pMRI research.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingHumansStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesELSIExpert Stakeholder OpinionsNeuroethicsNeuroimagingPortable MRI ResearchResearch Ethics

Identifiers

PMID39885743
PMCPMC11798672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.