ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2025
Improving outcomes with early and intensive metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a long-term modeling analysis of clinical and cost outcomes in Italy.
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Highly Effective Glucose-Lowering Agents: Do Current Practices Optimize Clinical and Economic Outcomes?Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This analysis quantifies the potential long-term clinical and cost benefits of early and intensive metabolic control (EIMC) versus conventional management in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in Italy. Methods: The PRIME T2D Model was used to project clinical and cost outcomes over long-term time horizons for a newly diagnosed cohort of patients receiving EIMC or conventional management. EIMC was associated with a mean glycated hemoglobin reduction of 0.6% from baseline and a mean weight loss of 9.5 kg (8.2%) for a duration of 6 years, before gradually returning to the same levels as the conventional management arm over 6 years. Modifiable risk factors were assumed to progress over time based on published regression functions. Direct and indirect costs associated with diabetes-related complications were accounted in 2021 Euros (EUR), with unit costs and health state utilities derived from published sources. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% annually. Results: For the population diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 2021 (estimated at 216,417 cases), EIMC was projected to add approximately 33,112 years of life and 55,403 quality-adjusted life years versus conventional management. Cost savings with EIMC were estimated at EUR 494 million, EUR 608 million and EUR 628 million in the incident population at 10- and 20- and 50-year time horizons, respectively. Conclusions: According to this modeling study, early and intensive metabolic control has the potential to substantially improve clinical outcomes and reduce economic burden compared with conventional management of patients with type 2 diabetes in Italy. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01553-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.