ReviewiScience2025
Application of nanomaterials in precision treatment of lung cancer.
Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanovaccines for lung cancer: Platforms, mechanistic insights, and translational challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Peptide-Based Nanocarriers for Targeted Drug Delivery: Recent Advances, Strategies, and Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Metal nanoparticles in cancer theranostics: from synthesis to tumor microenvironment-responsive applications.Drug delivery · 2025Review
- Beyond borders: engineering organ-targeted immunotherapies to overcome site-specific barriers in cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Review
- Targeting autophagy to enhance cancer immunotherapy: emerging mechanisms and strategies.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Bio-Functional Nanomaterials for Enhanced Lung Cancer Therapy: The Synergistic Roles of Vitamins D and K.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Bioactive components and delivery strategies of food-medicine homologous substances in lung cancer therapy: current advances and clinical translation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies worldwide, characterized by high mortality rates due to its aggressive nature, metastatic potential, and drug resistance. Despite advancements in conventional therapies, their efficacy is often limited by systemic toxicity, poor tumor specificity, and the emergence of resistance mechanisms. Nanomedicine has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges, leveraging the unique physicochemical properties of nanomaterials to enhance drug delivery, reduce off-target effects, and enable combination therapies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the applications of nanomaterials in lung cancer treatment, focusing on advancements in chemotherapy, phototherapy, and immunotherapy. Key strategies include the development of stimuli-responsive nanoparticles, active targeting mechanisms, and multifunctional platforms for co-delivery of therapeutic agents. Notable successes, such as liposomal formulations and polymeric nanoparticles, highlight the potential to overcome biological barriers and improve therapeutic outcomes. However, significant challenges remain, including limited tumor penetration, immunogenicity, scalability in manufacturing, and regulatory complexities. Addressing these limitations through innovative design, advanced manufacturing technologies, and interdisciplinary collaboration will be critical to translating nanomedicine from bench to bedside. Overall, nanomedicine represents a transformative frontier in lung cancer therapy, offering the potential to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.