Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39886525›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602025

Patient Advisory Groups in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Collaborative Relationship Between Patients and Researchers.

Linda Yoo, Mara Shapiro, Ihsan Kahveci, Isabela Hernandez, Rachael Whittemore, Tanvi Kale, Samantha Winders, Kendra Kamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linda YooUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1476-9999
Mara ShapiroUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ihsan KahveciDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Isabela HernandezUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Rachael WhittemoreValley Health Surgical Oncology, Winchester, VA, USA.
Tanvi KaleUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.
Samantha WindersUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kendra KampUniversity of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7753-3564

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
A Comprehensive Self-Management Intervention for individuals with Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseK23NR020044 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KAMP, KENDRA JOY · 2022 to 2024
$430k
Sleep-Wake Cycles of Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseF31NR020426 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YOO, LINDA · 2023 to 2024
$100k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NINR NIH HHS F31 NR020426NINR NIH HHS K23 NR020044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient advisory groups are key to guiding research studies through meaningful engagement with the population of interest. Although patient advisory groups are greatly valuable to research studies, they are underutilized in inflammatory bowel disease research. Thus, this study aims to describe the development and implementation of a patient advisory group and evaluate the perspectives of researchers and members. Methods: The Comprehensive Self-Management for inflammatory bowel disease study patient advisory group was created in 2022. The patient advisory group members and researchers completed the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool via an online survey. Thematic analysis of responses was used to identify common themes, and descriptive statistics were reported. Results: The patient advisory group comprised of patients with inflammatory bowel disease met quarterly. Eight members and three researchers evaluated the patient advisory group. The five emerging themes were (1) lived experience of patient advisory group members; (2) diversity and representation; (3) purposeful engagement; (4) positives of patient advisory group; and (5) improvements to patient advisory group. All members agreed or strongly agreed that the meetings were a good use of their time, and all researchers strongly agreed that the group added value to the research study. Conclusion: Patient advisory groups can create unique and positive experiences for both members and researchers when feedback is meaningfully sought, intentional, and incorporated into the study. There is a need to continue creating and using patient advisory groups with the intention of identifying problems and finding solutions alongside the inflammatory bowel disease community.

Indexed as

inflammatory bowel diseasepatient advisory groupspatient-centered research

Identifiers

PMID39886525
PMCPMC11780840

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.