Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39887236›Full record

ReviewJournal of virology2025

Viral influencers: deciphering the role of endogenous retroviral LTR12 repeats in cellular gene expression.

Veronika Krchlikova, Yueshuang Lu, Daniel Sauter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic-microbial coevolution in human development: chromosome 2 fusion, and human accelerated regions.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veronika KrchlikovaInstitute for Medical Virology and Epidemiology of Viral Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9192-5866
Yueshuang LuInstitute for Medical Virology and Epidemiology of Viral Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel SauterInstitute for Medical Virology and Epidemiology of Viral Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7665-0040

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SA 2676/3-1, SFB 1506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human genome is like a museum of ancient retroviral infections. It contains a large number of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) that bear witness to past integration events. About 5,000 of them are so-called long terminal repeat 12 (LTR12) elements. Compared with 20,000 human genes, this is a remarkable number. Although LTR12 elements can act as promoters or enhancers of cellular genes, the function of most of these retroviral elements has remained unclear. In our mini-review, we show that different LTR12 elements share many similarities, including common transcription factor binding sites. Furthermore, we summarize novel insights into the epigenetic mechanisms governing their silencing and activation. Specific examples of genes and pathways that are regulated by LTR12 loci are used to illustrate the regulatory network built by these repetitive elements. A particular focus is on their role in the regulation of antiviral immune responses, tumor cell proliferation, and senescence. Finally, we describe how a targeted activation of this fascinating ERV family could be used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.

Indexed as

Endogenous RetrovirusesGene Expression RegulationTerminal Repeat SequencesAnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticGenome, HumanHumanscancerendogenous retrovirusesERV9HDAC inhibitorinnate immunityLTR12

Identifiers

PMID39887236
PMCPMC11853044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.