ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Prenatal diagnosis and clinical pregnancy outcome of fetuses with conotruncal defects in a Chinese cohort.
Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Yield of Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Structural Anomalies: An Updated Systematic Review.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Pooled it
- Prenatal diagnosis and clinical pregnancy outcome of fetuses with conotruncal defects in a Chinese cohort.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore genetic etiologies of conotruncal defects (CTDs) in fetuses by analyzing the results of different genetic tests and to assess pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with CTD in a Chinese prenatal cohort.
methodsA total of 146 fetuses that underwent invasive prenatal genetic testing for CTD at the prenatal diagnosis center of the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All of them underwent chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and karyotype analysis, but only 27 underwent whole-exome sequencing (WES). The results of these different genetic testing methods were collected and compared. Data on pregnancy outcomes and neonate prognosis were obtained from the electronic medical records and postpartum telephone follow-up.
resultsAmong the 146 fetuses with CTD, the chromosome abnormality rate was 22.6% (33/146), and the detection rate of abnormal chromosomes in CMA and karyotype was 15.8% (23/146). Among the 27 pregnant women who accepted WES, five had pathogenic variants. The detection rate of abnormal chromosomes by CMA was higher in infants with an interrupted aortic arch (IAA) than in the other infant groups (60.0%, χ
conclusionCongenital heart disease is a complex congenital heart disease with an etiology closely related to genetic abnormalities. Therefore, invasive genetic testing and CMA are recommended as first-line tests for all fetuses with CTD detected by prenatal ultrasound, especially IAA. WES should be recommended when necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.