ArticleClinical and translational allergy2025
Predictors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery in Finnish patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Indirect Treatment Comparison of Tezepelumab Versus Other Biologics in Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Early and Sustained Improvements in Sense of Smell With Tezepelumab Treatment in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (WAYPOINT).International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Trial
- Comorbid Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Asthma: Shared Risk Factors and Treatment Implications-An EAACI Task Force Report.Allergy · 2026Article
- Characterization of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients Based on Markers of Type 2 Inflammation: Findings From the European CRS Outcome Registry (CHRINOSOR).Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Article
- Predictors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery in Finnish patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Global airways: a Danish nationwide real-life registry of biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) may benefit from endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), some patients will experience polyp recurrence, adding to the overall disease burden of CRSwNP. We aimed to investigate predictors of revision ESS in patients with CRSwNP.
methodsA nationwide population-based study including all adults diagnosed with CRSwNP who had surgical procedure codes for ESS (N = 3506), followed up between January 2012 and December 2019. Logistic regression models provided adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the odds of revision surgery within one and 3 years post-index surgery.
results559 (15.9%) of the patients had at least one revision surgery during the follow-up. Median time to revision of ESS was 425 days (interquartile range: 213-898). Baseline asthma (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.17-2.12) and antibiotic use (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.04) were associated with higher odds of revision ESS, particularly within 3 years post-index surgery, whereas Increasing age was inversely associated with the odds of ESS revision (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.88). The highest odds of revision ESS were observed within 3 years post-index surgery in patients who had undergone extensive surgery at index (OR = 14.13, 95% CI 3.41-95.64) compared with those who had undergone limited surgery. OCS use was frequent among CRSwNP patients, with a higher cumulative dose in patients undergoing multiple ESS revisions (63%, n = 97, median daily dose 3.29 mg, IQR: 1.64-3.70) compared with patients without revisions (49%, n = 1361 and 1.64 mg, IQR: 1.64-3.29, respectively. p-value <0.001).
conclusionsA small proportion of CRSwNP patients require revision ESS with associated high cumulative OCS doses, highlighting the need for additional therapies to achieve disease control and reduce the corticosteroid burden. A few simple baseline characteristics can predict the need for recurrent surgery among the patients with CRSwNP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.